Fixed dosing versus weight-based dosing of HIV-1 prophylactic monoclonal antibodies in adults: a post-hoc,...

Pharmacokinetic (PK) modelling and simulations have been used to support label changes of dosing levels or strategies for multiple marketed therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Using data from early-phase clinical trials in adults without HIV-1, we compared fixed and weight-based dosing strategies for three HIV-1 broadly neutralising mAbs planned for prevention efficacy evaluation: PGDM1400LS, PGT121.414.LS, and VRC07-523LS.

We used a two-compartment population PK model to describe overall trends and inter-individual variability in post-administration serum concentrations over time from individuals administered PGDM1400LS (n = 95), PGT121.414.LS (n = 113), or VRC07-523LS (n = 251) subcutaneously or intravenously. We evaluated the effect of body weight on various PK parameters, including clearance rate, and simulated mAb concentrations after fixed and weight-based dosing administrations using sex-specific weights observed in participants from two recent HIV-1 mAb efficacy trials. We compared magnitudes and inter-individual variabilities of concentrations at specific post-administration timepoints, areas under the time-concentration curves (AUC), and predicted neutralisation titres against representative HIV-1 virus strains.

For all three mAbs, we observed a modest effect of body weight on clearance rate and volumes of the central and peripheral compartments. The population-level magnitude and variability in time-specific concentrations, AUC, and predicted neutralisation titres were comparable between the two dosing strategies for both sexes. The relationship between body weight and concentrations differed between the two dosing strategies with a positive correlation for weight-based dosing and a negative correlation for fixed dosing. For individuals with body weight below the 15th or above the 85th percentiles, fixed dosing resulted in <3% difference in median AUC compared to the overall population. For lower weight individuals, fixed dosing improved AUC, potentially correcting the underdosing seen in the previous weight-based mAb efficacy trials. For higher weight individuals (e.g., >100 kg), body weight-based dosing or a higher fixed dose may be preferred.

For HIV-1 prophylactic mAbs, a fixed-dose approach, possibly banded by weight categories may be advantageous over weight-based dosing, as it offers increased operational efficiency while maintaining comparable pharmacokinetics and inter-individual consistency.

NIAID.