Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Associative Learning01:27

Associative Learning

318
Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...
318
Nonconscious Mimicry01:13

Nonconscious Mimicry

4.5K
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
4.5K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

6.0K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
6.0K
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

15.8K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
15.8K
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies02:09

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies

37.6K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
37.6K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Disparate privacy risks from medical AI.

Nature·2026
Same author

Latent Causal Modeling for 3D Brain MRI Counterfactuals.

Deep generative models : 5th MICCAI workshop, DGM4MICCAI 2025, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2025, Daejeon, South Korea, September 23, 2025, Proceedings. DGM4MICCAI (Workshop) (5th : 2025 : Taejon-si, Korea)·2026
Same author

Average Calibration Losses for Reliable Uncertainty in Medical Image Segmentation.

IEEE transactions on medical imaging·2026
Same author

Optimization and External Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Segmentation and Quantification of Traumatic Brain Injury Lesions on Head Computed Tomography.

Journal of neurotrauma·2026
Same author

Calibration and Uncertainty for multiRater Volume Assessment in multiorgan Segmentation (CURVAS) challenge results.

Computers in biology and medicine·2025
Same author

TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods: a Korean translation.

Ewha medical journal·2025
Same journal

Generative morphodynamic forecasting enables robust zero-shot volumetric medical segmentation.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same journal

ContiMorph: An unsupervised learning framework for cardiac motion tracking with time-continuous diffeomorphism.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same journal

MedP-CLIP: Medical CLIP with region-aware prompt integration.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same journal

Multi-organ guided diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment via hierarchical alignment and knowledge distillation.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same journal

SUDA: Simultaneous unsupervised knowledge distillation and adaptation of foundation models for efficient pathological image analysis.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same journal

Beyond the LUMIR challenge: The pathway to foundational registration models.

Medical image analysis·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2025

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
08:53

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories

Published on: November 14, 2018

9.6K

Robust image representations with counterfactual contrastive learning.

Mélanie Roschewitz1, Fabio De Sousa Ribeiro1, Tian Xia1

  • 1Imperial College London, Department of Computing, London, UK.

Medical Image Analysis
|June 14, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Counterfactual contrastive learning improves medical image analysis by creating realistic data variations. This novel approach enhances model generalization and reduces disparities, outperforming standard methods on diverse datasets.

Keywords:
Contrastive learningCounterfactual image generationModel robustness

More Related Videos

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
05:39

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

5.2K
Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

11.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2025

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
08:53

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories

Published on: November 14, 2018

9.6K
Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
05:39

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

5.2K
Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

11.8K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Machine Learning
  • Computer Vision

Background:

  • Contrastive pretraining enhances model generalization but relies heavily on data augmentation for positive pairs.
  • Existing augmentation methods often fail to capture realistic domain variations in medical imaging, such as scanner differences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce counterfactual contrastive learning, a novel framework using causal image synthesis for improved positive pair generation.
  • Enhance robustness to acquisition shifts and improve downstream performance in medical image analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Leveraged causal image synthesis to generate counterfactual positive pairs that capture relevant domain variations.
  • Evaluated the framework across five datasets (chest radiography, mammography) using SimCLR and DINO-v2 objectives.
  • Assessed performance based on robustness to acquisition shifts and downstream task accuracy.

Main Results:

  • Counterfactual contrastive learning demonstrated superior robustness to acquisition shifts compared to standard contrastive learning.
  • Achieved better downstream performance on both in-distribution and external datasets, particularly for under-represented scanners.
  • Showcased reduction in subgroup disparities across biological sex, extending beyond acquisition shifts.

Conclusions:

  • Counterfactual contrastive learning offers a powerful approach to generating semantically meaningful positive pairs for medical imaging.
  • The method significantly improves model generalization, robustness, and fairness in medical image analysis tasks.
  • This framework holds promise for developing more reliable and equitable AI in healthcare.