Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025
Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
Published on: February 23, 2024
Adherence to clinical practice guidelines amongst adolescents with buccal fixed orthodontic appliances in northeast
Sebastiaan P van Doornik1, Scott Lietmeijer2, Yijin Ren1
1Department of Orthodontics, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Background:
Adolescents undergoing orthodontic fixed appliance treatment face an increased risk of dental caries and developing white spot lesions (WSLs) due to challenges in maintaining effective oral hygiene. Preventive measures, including adherence to clinical guidelines, are important to reduce these risks.
Objective:
To analyse adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) amongst patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with buccal fixed appliances in the northeast of the Netherlands.
Methods:
A survey was presented to 539 adolescents aged 12-17 undergoing buccal fixed appliance treatment. Participants were recruited from ten orthodontic practices. The survey assessed adherence to the six recommendations of the Dutch CPGs. An adherence sum score (range 0 to 6) was calculated. Descriptive statistics and linear regression analyses (1000 bootstrap samples) were performed to analyse the relationships between participants' characteristics and adherence sum scores.
Results:
In total, 485 adolescents started the survey, of whom 393 (72.9%) could be included (57% female; 48.9% aged 13 or 14). The median adherence sum score was 5 (IQR 4, 5), and 22.6% (n = 89) had an adherence sum score of 6. Males had a lower adherence sum score than females (-0.442, 95% CI: -0.979, -0.234). Older participants had a lower adherence sum score than younger participants (-0.066, 95%CI: -0.136, 0.002) per year of age. Higher educated participants had a lower adherence sum score than participants with lower education (-0.534, 95%CI: -0.953, -0.096).
Limitations:
Self-reported data may introduce information bias as participants may give socially desirable answers.
Conclusions:
Adherence to the CPGs amongst adolescents with buccal fixed orthodontic appliances is suboptimal, particularly in boys and older adolescents. Tailored educational interventions may address these gaps.
