Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Published on: May 19, 2022
Cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted total hysterectomy for benign pathologies compared to open surgery: a
Richard Paul-Dehlinger1, Alexandra Vappereau2, Alicia Le Bras2
1Department of Surgery and Oncological Gynecology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France; Intercommunal Hospital Center André Grégoire, Montreuil, France.
Background:
Hysterectomy for benign pathologies is one of the most common gynecological surgeries. Over the past few years, robotic surgery has become an alternative to traditional surgery, but at a higher cost.
Objective:
Calculate the cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted hysterectomy (RAH) compared with open hysterectomy (OH) for the purpose of supporting public decision-making, as well as the additional cost per major postoperative complication (ClavienDindo score ≥ 3) avoided one month after surgery robotic versus open surgery.
Methods:
Single-center retrospective study including patients operated on for benign hysterectomy at La Pitié Salpêtrière hospital between January 2016 and December 2019: 24 by robotic approach, and 54 by open surgery. Comparison of robotic surgery to open. Calculation of a cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Use of the propensity score inverse weighting method to ensure comparability of groups.
Results:
Robotic surgery has a total cost of €7704 at 1 month per patient compared to €5301 for open surgery with an additional cost of € 828,621 per major postoperative complication avoided, longer operating time and an absence of significant difference in terms of complications and length of hospitalization.
Conclusion:
In terms of cost-effectiveness, RAH had a high probability to be more expensive and more effective than OH. In the years to come, we can expect a development of robotic surgery with rationalization of the practice, with appropriate selection of patients for robotic surgery, development of outpatient surgery and a reduction in the cost of the equipment.

