Friend or foe: assessing the value of animal models for facilitating clinical breakthroughs in complement research

Animal experiments have long been a cornerstone of advancements in biomedical research, particularly in developing novel therapeutic strategies for inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. However, these historically important approaches are now facing growing scrutiny for ethical reasons, concerns about translational limitations to human biology, and the rising availability of animal-free research methods. This shift raises a critical question: How relevant and effective are animal models for driving future advancements in today's research landscape? This Review aims to explore this question within the field of biomedical research on the complement system, critically evaluating the contribution of animal models to the recent advancements and clinical successes of complement-targeted therapies. Specifically, we assess areas where animal studies have been indispensable for elucidating disease mechanisms and conducting preclinical evaluations, alongside instances where findings from animal models failed to translate successfully to human trials. Furthermore, we discuss similarities and differences in the complement system between animals and humans and explore innovations in animal research designed to improve translatability to human biology. By assessing the contributions of animal studies to complement therapeutics, this Review aims to provide insights into animal models' strengths, limitations, and evolving role in complement research.