Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

184
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
184
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

709
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
709
Bias01:22

Bias

5.6K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
5.6K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

163
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
163
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

441
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
441
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

2.9K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
2.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How Ready Are Our Near-Graduates for Internship? Data from Seven Medical Schools.

Medical science educator·2026
Same author

Evaluating search quality and article choice in evidence-based medicine assignments of preclinical students.

Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA·2025
Same author

Career development awards support early-stage researchers in life sciences entrepreneurship.

Nature biotechnology·2025
Same author

Class 1 Indications for Coronary Revascularization Identified in Prekidney Transplant Screening.

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN·2025
Same author

"I still have not mastered that skill!" Medical student perspectives on a simulation-based evidence-based medicine competency assessment.

Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA·2025
Same author

Building a community-centered clinical research center in an underserved New York City neighborhood to enhance access to research, equity, and quality of care.

Journal of clinical and translational science·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

713

Proposed Modifiable Scoring Criteria for Studies Included in Meta-Analyses to Reduce Measurement Bias.

Gabriel Vizgan1, Bernard von Simson2, Joey Nicholson3

  • 1Urology, State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate Health Sciences University, New York, USA.

Cureus
|June 16, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new scoring system addresses bias in meta-regression for systematic reviews. This method enhances the scientific weight of studies and highlights underrepresented data for better interpretation and practice adaptation.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Evidence Synthesis
  • Medical Research Methodology

Background:

Keywords:
bias identificationmeta-analysisnovel scoring systemsystemic reviewvalidity assessment

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.7K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

73.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

713
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.7K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

73.3K
  • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are susceptible to bias from inconsistent literature reporting.
  • Meta-regression calculations can be particularly vulnerable to reporting inconsistencies, impacting review conclusions.
  • Existing methods may not adequately address the scientific weight of individual studies or identify underrepresented data.