Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
Published on: December 9, 2012
Managing for climate and production goals on crop-lands
Shelby C McClelland1,2, Deborah Bossio3, Doria R Gordon4,5
1Soil and Crop Sciences, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY USA.
None:
The assumption that crop-land natural climate solutions (NCS) have benefits for both climate change mitigation and crop production remains largely untested. Here we model GHG emissions and crop yields from crop-land NCS through the end of the century. We find that favourable (win-win) outcomes were the exception not the norm; grass cover crops with no tillage lead to cumulative global GHG mitigation of 32.6 Pg CO2 equivalent, 95% confidence interval (29.5, 35.7), by 2050 but reduce cumulative crop yields by 4.8 Pg, 95% confidence interval (4.0, 5.7). Legume cover crops with no tillage result in favourable outcomes through 2050 but increase GHG emissions for some regions by 2100. Crop-lands with low soil nitrogen and high clay are more likely to have favourable outcomes. Avoiding crop losses, we find modest GHG mitigation benefits from crop-land NCS, 4.4 Pg CO2 equivalent, 95% confidence interval (4.2, 4.6) by 2050, indicating crop-land soil will constitute a fraction of food system decarbonization.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
What is Climate?
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss
Sustainable Development
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Global Climate Change
C4 Pathway and CAM
C4 Pathway
The C4 pathway is used by plants such as...

