Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Case Studies01:22

Case Studies

12.1K
There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
12.1K
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

15.3K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
15.3K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

24.1K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
24.1K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

184
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
184
Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.7K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.7K
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

12.2K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
12.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Recommendations and guidance for enhancing systematic reviews of single-case experimental design research.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2026
Same author

A systematic review and single-case meta-analysis of performance feedback as teacher professional development.

Journal of school psychology·2026
Same author

Comparing masked and traditional visual analysis of multiple-baseline designs.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2025
Same author

In Defense of Applied Behavior Analysis and Evidence-Based Practice.

Perspectives on behavior science·2025
Same author

A Meta-Visual-Analysis of Single-Case Experimental Design Research.

Behavior modification·2025
Same author

A review of visual analysis reporting procedures in the functional communication training literature.

School psychology (Washington, D.C.)·2024
Same journal

A Mediational Theory of Verbal Relations.

Perspectives on behavior science·2026
Same journal

It is Time to Retire "Noncontingent Reinforcement".

Perspectives on behavior science·2026
Same journal

Using Wearable Technology to Predict the Occurrence of Severe Behavior Problems among Neurodiverse Individuals: A Systematic Review.

Perspectives on behavior science·2026
Same journal

Toward a Modern View of Pavlovian Conditioning in Applied Behavior Analysis.

Perspectives on behavior science·2026
Same journal

Behavior, Process, and Evolution in the Multiscale Molar Paradigm.

Perspectives on behavior science·2026
Same journal

Citing the Literature.

Perspectives on behavior science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 19, 2025

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

4.7K

Questionable and Improved Research Practices in Single-Case Experimental Design: Initial Investigation and Findings.

Matt Tincani1, Jason Travers1, Art Dowdy1

  • 1Department of Teaching and Learning, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA USA.

Perspectives on Behavior Science
|June 16, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers identified questionable research practices in single-case experimental designs (SCED). This study outlines improved practices as alternatives to enhance research validity and replicability.

Keywords:
Improved research practicesOpen science practicesQuality research indicatorsQuestionable research practicesSingle-case experimental design

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.2K
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 19, 2025

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

4.7K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.2K
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.1K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Science
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Questionable research practices (QRPs) threaten the replicability and validity of scientific conclusions.
  • The application and identification of QRPs within single-case experimental designs (SCED) remain underexplored.
  • A lack of focus exists on developing and disseminating improved research practices as alternatives to QRPs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify questionable research practices (QRPs) in single-case experimental designs (SCED).
  • To identify improved research practices as alternatives to QRPs in SCED.
  • To lay the groundwork for enhancing the rigor of SCED.

Main Methods:

  • A virtual microconference involving 63 SCED researcher experts was conducted.
  • Focus groups were utilized to solicit examples of QRPs and improved practices across the research process.
  • Qualitative analysis of over 2,000 participant notes informed the identification of practice pairs.

Main Results:

  • 64 distinct pairs of questionable and improved research practices in SCED were identified.
  • Shared perspectives among experts on QRPs and improved practices were established.
  • The study highlights a consensus on the need for better research standards in SCED.

Conclusions:

  • There is a critical need to address questionable research practices in SCED.
  • Dissemination and evaluation of improved research practices are essential for advancing SCED methodology.
  • This work provides a foundation for developing evidence-based guidelines for SCED researchers.