Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Electrochemiluminescence Assays for Human Islet Autoantibodies
Published on: March 23, 2018
Interfering heterophile antibodies as the cause of persistently falsely elevated high-sensitivity troponin I on
Ivana Lapić1,2, Dunja Rogić1,2, Dragana Šegulja1
1Department of Laboratory Diagnostics,University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Hereby we describe a case of a 59-year-old female patient with persistently elevated high-sensitivity troponin I (hs-TnI) over the course of almost four years measured on Alinity i with the corresponding assay (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, USA). The patient underwent multiple extensive cardiological evaluations, but none of them suggested acute or chronic cardiac damage. Therefore, interference in measurement was suspected by the attending cardiologist and a detailed, stepwise laboratory investigation was undertaken in the sample with initial hs-TnI result of 2077 ng/L. Serial sample dilutions (1:2,1:5,1:10) did not match the expected, calculated hs-TnI concentrations, yielding both huge positive biases (62, 109 and 139%, respectively) and absolute differences (639, 453 and 290 ng/L, respectively). Precipitation with polyethylene-glycol, pretreatment in heterophilic blocking tubes (HBT) and immunoglobulin G depletion yielded hs-TnI results below the assay's diagnostic cut-off (< 15.6 ng/L). Alternate hs-TnI immunoassays (Siemens Healthineers, Beckman Coulter and Snibe) and measurement with the high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT) assay yielded results below assays' specific cut-off values. This investigation confirmed that results of hs-TnI obtained by the Abbott assay were spuriously elevated. Significant lowering of hs-TnI after HBT pretreatment indicated that heterophile antibodies are the most probable source of interference. Based on this finding, it was entered in the patient's medical record that future determinations of cardiac troponin should be performed with an alternate hs-TnI or hs-TnT assay. This case emphasizes that analytical interferences are usually immunoassay-dependent. Evaluation of laboratory results in the clinical context and close collaboration between laboratory and clinical staff is crucial for their recognition.
Hereby we describe a case of a 59-year-old female patient with persistently elevated high-sensitivity troponin I (hs-TnI) over the course of almost four years measured on Alinity i with the corresponding assay (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, USA). The patient underwent multiple extensive cardiological evaluations, but none of them suggested acute or chronic cardiac damage. Therefore, interference in measurement was suspected by the attending cardiologist and a detailed, stepwise laboratory investigation was undertaken in the sample with initial hs-TnI result of 2077 ng/L. Serial sample dilutions (1:2,1:5,1:10) did not match the expected, calculated hs-TnI concentrations, yielding both huge positive biases (62, 109 and 139%, respectively) and absolute differences (639, 453 and 290 ng/L, respectively). Precipitation with polyethylene-glycol, pretreatment in heterophilic blocking tubes (HBT) and immunoglobulin G depletion yielded hs-TnI results below the assay's diagnostic cut-off (< 15.6 ng/L). Alternate hs-TnI immunoassays (Siemens Healthineers, Beckman Coulter and Snibe) and measurement with the high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT) assay yielded results below assays' specific cut-off values. This investigation confirmed that results of hs-TnI obtained by the Abbott assay were spuriously elevated. Significant lowering of hs-TnI after HBT pretreatment indicated that heterophile antibodies are the most probable source of interference. Based on this finding, it was entered in the patient's medical record that future determinations of cardiac troponin should be performed with an alternate hs-TnI or hs-TnT assay. This case emphasizes that analytical interferences are usually immunoassay-dependent. Evaluation of laboratory results in the clinical context and close collaboration between laboratory and clinical staff is crucial for their recognition.
More Related Videos
10:12A Sensitive and Specific Quantitation Method for Determination of Serum Cardiac Myosin Binding Protein-C by Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassay
Published on: August 8, 2013
07:40Impact of High-intensity Interval Exercise and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Exercise on the Cardiac Troponin T Level at an Early Stage of Training
Published on: October 10, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Myasthenia Gravis: Diagnostic Tests
The edrophonium test is a diagnostic tool for myasthenia gravis. It involves...
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...