Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

A Protocol of Manual Tests to Measure Sensation and Pain in Humans
Published on: December 19, 2016
Pain assessment on a numerical scale with uncertainty intervals: a proof-of-concept simulation study
Markus Huber1, Ulrike Stamer1,2
1Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Background:
Reliable and validated scores assessing pain-related outcomes are an essential component of pain management. Point estimates, e.g., on the numeric rating scale (NRS), are widely used. Given the broad spectrum of physiological and psychological factors involved in a patient's pain experience, these point estimates entail inherent uncertainty. To account for this uncertainty, we propose a statistical framework featuring uncertainty intervals on a numerical scale assessing pain intensity.
Methods:
We describe a non-parametric statistical method to estimate the effectiveness of a pain intervention when patients provide an uncertainty interval of pain intensity rather than a single point estimate. We consider pain intensities on a generic numerical pain scale (NPS) ranging from 0 to 10 and illustrate the method's performance with proof-of-concept simulation studies and sensitivity analyses.
Results:
The simulation studies demonstrate that the non-parametric method can derive correct estimates of the average treatment effects in idealized settings. Importantly, the method can represent the traditional pain assessment with point estimates when the widths of the uncertainty intervals are gradually decreased toward the mean of the uncertainty interval.
Conclusion:
We proposed a new statistical framework to account for patient-specific uncertainties in pain intensity as measured on a numerical scale. The clinical importance of the method lies in its ability to reflect the large heterogeneity of individual pain experiences and the possibility of investigating pain-related aspects that go beyond a traditional pain assessment with point estimates. Future clinical studies are required to assess the method's clinical validity and utility.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
Uncertainty: Overview
Confidence Intervals
A...
Estimating Population Standard Deviation

