Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity01:25

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

1.4K
Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity refer to the ability of drugs to cause genetic defects and induce cancer, respectively. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies agents into four groups based on their carcinogenic potential. Group 1 agents are known human carcinogens; group 2A agents are probably carcinogenic to humans; group 3 agents lack data to support their role in carcinogenesis; and group 4 includes agents for which data support that they are not likely to be...
1.4K
Mouse Models of Cancer Study02:43

Mouse Models of Cancer Study

5.7K
Mice have long served as models for studying human biology and pathology because of their phylogenetic and physiological similarity with humans. They are also easy to maintain and breed in the laboratory, and hence, many inbred strains are now available for research. Studies on mice have contributed immeasurably to our understanding of cancer biology.
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
5.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A round-robin exercise for the precise prediction of aqueous solubility of organic chemicals using chemometric, machine learning, and stacking ensemble of deep learning models.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2026
Same author

AI and ML for small molecule drug discovery in the big data era IV.

Molecular diversity·2026
Same author

Machine Learning-Based Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship Modeling of Repeated Dose Toxicity: A Data-Driven Approach Following Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Test Guidelines 407, 408, and 422 Supported by Experimental Validation.

Chemical research in toxicology·2026
Same author

Nanoinformatics: spanning scales, systems and solutions.

Beilstein journal of nanotechnology·2026
Same author

A similarity-augmented q-RASPR framework for the antioxidant potential prediction and identification of functional food compounds.

Food chemistry·2026
Same author

Comparative machine learning and deep learning frameworks for robust carcinogenicity prediction and activity cliff analysis.

Environmental science. Processes & impacts·2026
Same journal

SpaceExpander: An Automated System for Drafting Markush Claims to Expand Chemical Space.

Molecular informatics·2026
Same journal

A Structure-Informed Atlas of Venom-Derived Peptides Reveals the Organization of Chemical Space.

Molecular informatics·2026
Same journal

ConGen: Targeted Molecule Generation Through Contrastive Learning and Latent Optimization.

Molecular informatics·2026
Same journal

Novel Molecules Generation Using Graph Generative Adversarial Networks.

Molecular informatics·2026
Same journal

An Attention-Driven Graph Transformer With Nonlinear Modeling and Neuro-Fuzzy Fusion for High-Order Toxic Molecular Graph Learning.

Molecular informatics·2026
Same journal

Molecular Modeling and Chemoinformatics in Ukraine.

Molecular informatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 19, 2025

The Lambda Select cII Mutation Detection System
07:08

The Lambda Select cII Mutation Detection System

Published on: April 26, 2018

8.0K

Development of Machine Learning-Based Models for Mutagenicity Predictions with Applications to Non-Sugar Sweeteners.

Shilpayan Ghosh1, Vinay Kumar1, Kunal Roy1

  • 1Drug Theoretics and Cheminformatics Laboratory, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India.

Molecular Informatics
|June 16, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning models predict mutagenicity of artificial sweeteners, offering a faster, cost-effective alternative to in vivo trials. Six compounds were prioritized as potentially mutagenic non-sugar sweeteners (NSSs).

Keywords:
Cohen's kMatthews’ correlation coefficientsShapley additive explanationsmachine learningnon‐sugar sweetenersquantiative structure‐activity relationshiprandom forest

More Related Videos

Assessment of Chemical Toxicity in Adult Drosophila Melanogaster
07:02

Assessment of Chemical Toxicity in Adult Drosophila Melanogaster

Published on: March 24, 2023

3.6K
In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox
05:47

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox

Published on: August 28, 2019

14.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 19, 2025

The Lambda Select cII Mutation Detection System
07:08

The Lambda Select cII Mutation Detection System

Published on: April 26, 2018

8.0K
Assessment of Chemical Toxicity in Adult Drosophila Melanogaster
07:02

Assessment of Chemical Toxicity in Adult Drosophila Melanogaster

Published on: March 24, 2023

3.6K
In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox
05:47

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox

Published on: August 28, 2019

14.1K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Toxicology
  • Food safety science

Background:

  • Artificial sweeteners, or non-sugar sweeteners (NSSs), have been used since WWII.
  • Concerns exist regarding the mutagenicity potential of NSSs, necessitating safety evaluations for new chemical registrations.
  • Traditional in vivo mutagenicity testing is time-consuming and costly.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate machine learning (ML) models for predicting the mutagenicity of NSSs.
  • To provide a more efficient alternative to experimental mutagenicity testing.
  • To identify potentially mutagenic NSSs for further investigation.

Main Methods:

  • Development of ML models using a dataset of 6881 organic compounds with random data splitting (50/50).
  • Cross-validation analysis to select the best performing ML models.
  • Consensus predictions for 332 NSSs using six selected models, incorporating applicability domain assessment.
  • Comparison with k-nearest neighbor and toxicity estimation software predictions.

Main Results:

  • Six ML models were selected based on stringent cross-validation.
  • Consensus predictions identified six compounds as potentially mutagenic NSSs.
  • Model-derived predictions showed reliability when compared to other computational methods.

Conclusions:

  • ML models offer a viable and efficient approach for predicting NSS mutagenicity.
  • The study successfully prioritized six compounds as potentially mutagenic NSSs.
  • Developed models are available for public use to aid in food safety assessments.