Low birth weight among neonates: Investigating incidence, risk factors, and AI-enabled predictive modeling for risk

Archana Maju1, Sarita Shokandha1, Sugandha Arya2

  • 1Rajkumari Amrit College of Nursing, DGHS, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi, India.

Insights

Low birth weight (LBW) affects 30.47% of neonates. Key risk factors include inadequate maternal weight gain, preterm birth, fetal complications, and multiple gestations. An AI model accurately predicts LBW risk.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal Health
  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Background:

  • Low birth weight (LBW) is a critical indicator of global maternal health and prenatal care effectiveness.
  • Assessing LBW incidence and identifying associated risk factors are crucial for improving neonatal outcomes.
  • Predictive modeling using AI can enhance early detection and intervention strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the incidence and significant risk factors of low birth weight (LBW) in neonates.
  • To develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven predictive model for LBW risk assessment.
  • To evaluate the accuracy and potential clinical utility of the AI predictive model.

Main Methods:

  • A dual research design combining descriptive and case-control methodologies was employed.
  • Descriptive and inferential statistics were used for data analysis.
  • An AI-based logistic regression model was developed for predicting LBW.

Main Results:

  • The incidence rate of LBW was 304.7 per 1000 live births (30.47%).
  • Significant risk factors identified include inadequate maternal weight gain (<9 kg), preterm gestation (<37 weeks), fetal complications, and multiple gestations.
  • The AI predictive model achieved a high overall accuracy of 90% in classifying newborns by birth weight.

Conclusions:

  • Identified risk factors for LBW are largely modifiable, emphasizing the importance of early prenatal care.
  • The AI predictive model demonstrates high accuracy and potential for early risk detection.
  • Integrating this AI model into healthcare systems can significantly reduce LBW incidence and improve neonatal health outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.5K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
11.4K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
184
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
709