Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Evaluation of Host-Pathogen Responses and Vaccine Efficacy in Mice
Published on: February 22, 2019
Vaccination in Forcibly Displaced, Pediatric Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Sargun Virk1,2, Andrew Milewski1,2, Nadia Khan3
1Human Rights Impact Lab, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Importance:
Accessing forcibly displaced, pediatric populations for vaccination is challenging, and precise vaccination rates remain largely unknown.
Objective:
To estimate vaccination coverage and identify factors associated with vaccination in forcibly displaced, pediatric populations.
Data Sources:
Six databases were searched in November 2023-Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane-with no restrictions on language or publication dates. The search strategy included all appropriate controlled vocabulary and keywords for vaccination, pediatrics, and displaced populations.
Study Selection:
Included studies were original research articles investigating vaccination in pediatric populations (<19 years) that were forcibly displaced as defined by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Reviews, nonresearch articles, and qualitative studies were excluded. Screening was conducted by 2 independent reviewers with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. Of 1731 studies identified, 294 underwent full-text review.
Data Extraction And Synthesis:
Data abstraction and quality assessment followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines. A random-effects model was used to pool data. Data quality was assessed using the Downs and Black Checklist.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
The primary outcome was pooled vaccination coverage, defined as the proportion vaccinated. Additionally, the factors associated with vaccination were pooled from reported unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) or adjusted ORs (aORs).
Results:
Of the 1731 studies identified, 39 studies from 24 countries were included. Based on 11 studies, the full vaccination coverage was 21% (95% CI, 11%-36%; I2 = 98.90%). Factors associated with greater odds of vaccination included having 2 or more children in the family (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.43-2.02; I2 = 0.00%; aOR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.28-2.57; I2 = 0.00%), higher levels of guardian education (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.06-2.43; I2 = 71.60%), father's employment (OR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.67-4.53; I2 = 0.00%), higher household income (OR = 1.33; 95% CI, 1.29-1.37; I2 = 0.00%), housing stability (OR, 2.80; 95% CI, 2.10-3.73; I2 = 0.00%; aOR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.55-4.40; I2 = 0.00%), and residing in an area with more access to health care services (OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.44-3.09; I2 = 0.00%), while being forcibly displaced was associated with lower odds of vaccination (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.89; I2 = 69.41%; aOR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.63-0.86; I2 = 13.64%).
Conclusion And Relevance:
In this systematic review and meta-analysis of vaccination coverage among forcibly displaced, pediatric populations, vaccination coverage remained low. These findings highlight the urgent need for development of healthcare strategies and policies to close the immunization gap in this vulnerable population.
More Related Videos
09:37Detection of Polyfunctional T Cells in Children Vaccinated with Japanese Encephalitis Vaccine via the Flow Cytometry Technique
Published on: September 23, 2022
08:36Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Vaccinations
Immunodeficiency Diseases
There are three main causes of immunodeficiency...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies