Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Calculating pH Changes in a Buffer Solution02:45

Calculating pH Changes in a Buffer Solution

54.1K
A buffer can prevent a sudden drop or increase in the pH of a solution after the addition of a strong acid or base up to its buffering capacity; however, such addition of a strong acid or base does result in the slight pH change of the solution. The small pH change can be calculated by determining the resulting change in the concentration of buffer components, i.e., a weak acid and its conjugate base or vice versa. The concentrations obtained using these stoichiometric calculations can be used...
54.1K
Titration of a Weak Base with a Strong Acid01:20

Titration of a Weak Base with a Strong Acid

5.8K
The titration curve of a weak base like ammonia with a strong acid like hydrochloric acid is the mirror image of the titration curve of a weak acid with a strong base.
Using the ICE table and substituting the Kb value, we calculate the initial pH of 50 mL of 0.1 M ammonia to be 11.11. Addition of 25 mL of 0.1 M hydrochloric acid to this solution of ammonia results in a buffer with an equal concentration of ammonia and ammonium ions. The pH of this buffer can be calculated by substituting these...
5.8K
Titration of a Weak Acid with a Strong Base01:30

Titration of a Weak Acid with a Strong Base

2.4K
In titrating a weak acid with a strong base, different calculation methods are applied at various stages. Initially, the pH of a weak acid like acetic acid is calculated using its dissociation constant (Ka) and an ICE table. Upon addition of a strong base such as sodium hydroxide, a buffer forms, and its pH is determined using the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation. As more base is added and the titration reaches the halfway point, the pH becomes equal to the pKa of the acid, indicating equal...
2.4K
Acid-Base Titration Curves02:23

Acid-Base Titration Curves

129.7K
A titration curve is a plot of some solution property versus the amount of added titrant. For acid-base titrations, solution pH is a useful property to monitor because it varies predictably with the solution composition and, therefore, may be used to monitor the titration’s progress and detect its endpoint. Acid-base titration can be performed with a strong acid and a strong base, a strong acid and a weak base, or a strong base and a weak acid.
For a titration carried out for 25.00 mL of...
129.7K
Titration Calculations: Weak Acid - Strong Base03:55

Titration Calculations: Weak Acid - Strong Base

45.3K
Calculating pH for Titration Solutions: Weak Acid/Strong Base
For the titration of 25.00 mL of 0.100 M CH3CO2H with 0.100 M NaOH, the reaction can be represented as:
45.3K
Titration of Polyprotic Base with a Strong Acid01:18

Titration of Polyprotic Base with a Strong Acid

884
The titration of a polyprotic base such as sodium carbonate with a strong acid such as hydrochloric acid results in two equivalence points on the titration curve. At the first equivalence point, the carbonate ions in the base are completely converted to bicarbonate ions. The second equivalence point corresponds to the complete conversion of bicarbonate ions to carbonic acid, which dissociates into carbon dioxide and water. The region before the first equivalence point corresponds to the...
884

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improving the Estimation of p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> Values for All Titratable Amino Acids at the Water/Membrane Interface.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2026
Same author

Force Field and Membrane Patch Size Effects on Atomistic Models of Aquaporin-7.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

Constant-pH Molecular Dynamics of Cationic Peptide Dendrimers Binding to siRNA.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

<i>In Silico</i> Structural Analysis of the Grapevine Serine Protease VviSBT4.19 Involved in Defense against <i>P. viticola</i>.

Journal of agricultural and food chemistry·2025
Same author

TorchANI-Amber: Bridging Neural Network Potentials and Classical Biomolecular Simulations.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2025
Same author

TorchANI 2.0: An Extensible, High-Performance Library for the Design, Training, and Use of NN-IPs.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2025
Same journal

Multilevel Fragmentation and Boundary Corrections for Accurate Vibrational Spectra of Large Molecules.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

Special Topics: Developments of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry Methods in Asia.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

Predicting Excited-State Energies from Ground-State Descriptors in Thermally Fluctuating π-Conjugated Molecules.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

Many-Body Theory Predictions of Positron Binding Energies in Five-Membered Heterocycles Involving N, O, S, and NH Substituents.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

<i>opt</i>-DDAP: Optimizable Density-Derived Atomic Point Charges via Automatic Differentiation.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

A Force-Kernel Reformulation of the Extended-System Adaptive Biasing Force for Free-Energy Calculations.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Author Spotlight: In Silico Creation and Impact of Carbonylated Amino Acids on Protein Structure and Function
05:57

Author Spotlight: In Silico Creation and Impact of Carbonylated Amino Acids on Protein Structure and Function

Published on: April 26, 2024

500

Adding the AMBER 14SB Force Field to the Stochastic Titration CpHMD Method.

João G N Sequeira1, Adrian E Roitberg2, Miguel Machuqueiro1

  • 1BioISI─Instituto de Biossistemas e Ciências Integrativas, Departamento de Química e Bioquímica, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa 1749-016, Portugal.

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
|June 16, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Constant-pH molecular dynamics (CpHMD) simulations now support the AMBER 14SB force field, enhancing protonation landscape studies. This advancement enables direct comparisons across major protein force fields for improved biomolecular simulations.

More Related Videos

Deciphering the Structural Effects of Activating EGFR Somatic Mutations with Molecular Dynamics Simulation
15:05

Deciphering the Structural Effects of Activating EGFR Somatic Mutations with Molecular Dynamics Simulation

Published on: May 20, 2020

8.8K
Molecular Spring Constant Analysis by Biomembrane Force Probe Spectroscopy
08:10

Molecular Spring Constant Analysis by Biomembrane Force Probe Spectroscopy

Published on: November 20, 2021

3.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Author Spotlight: In Silico Creation and Impact of Carbonylated Amino Acids on Protein Structure and Function
05:57

Author Spotlight: In Silico Creation and Impact of Carbonylated Amino Acids on Protein Structure and Function

Published on: April 26, 2024

500
Deciphering the Structural Effects of Activating EGFR Somatic Mutations with Molecular Dynamics Simulation
15:05

Deciphering the Structural Effects of Activating EGFR Somatic Mutations with Molecular Dynamics Simulation

Published on: May 20, 2020

8.8K
Molecular Spring Constant Analysis by Biomembrane Force Probe Spectroscopy
08:10

Molecular Spring Constant Analysis by Biomembrane Force Probe Spectroscopy

Published on: November 20, 2021

3.1K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Biomolecular simulations
  • Protein dynamics

Background:

  • Accurate molecular dynamics (MD) simulations require incorporating pH effects to capture conformational, energetic, and protonation states.
  • Constant-pH molecular dynamics (CpHMD) methods, particularly stochastic titration CpHMD (st-CpHMD), are advanced techniques for pH-dependent simulations.
  • st-CpHMD currently supports GROMOS 54A7 and CHARMM 36m force fields.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To extend stochastic titration CpHMD (st-CpHMD) compatibility to the AMBER 14SB force field within the GROMACS software package.
  • To validate the modified AMBER 14SB force field for st-CpHMD simulations.
  • To enable direct performance comparisons between GROMOS 54A7, CHARMM 36m, and AMBER 14SB force fields in CpHMD.

Main Methods:

  • Implemented st-CpHMD support for the AMBER 14SB force field in GROMACS.
  • Introduced a minor modification to AMBER 14SB atomic partial charges for main chain neutralization.
  • Benchmarked the implementation using lysozyme and Staphylococcal nuclease proteins, comparing pKa predictions and computational costs.

Main Results:

  • The AMBER 14SB implementation achieved pKa prediction accuracy comparable to other force fields, with low root-mean-square error (RMSE).
  • AMBER 14SB simulations exhibited lower computational cost than CHARMM 36m but higher than GROMOS 54A7.
  • Identified challenging cases requiring further method refinement and suggested accelerating the PB/MC step for improved computational speed.

Conclusions:

  • Developed the first CpHMD method compatible with GROMOS 54A7, CHARMM 36m, and AMBER 14SB force fields.
  • Enabled direct, quantitative performance comparisons of major protein force fields for CpHMD simulations.
  • Highlighted the need for further optimization, particularly in the PB/MC step, to enhance computational efficiency.