Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Design Example: Resistive Touchscreen01:14

Design Example: Resistive Touchscreen

448
A device engineer plays a crucial role in designing user interfaces for mobile devices. One such interface is the resistive touchscreen, which fundamentally consists of two metallic layers: a flexible upper layer and a rigid lower layer, separated by a narrow gap. The high resistance between these two layers is a key characteristic of this design.
When a user touches the screen, the two layers make contact at a specific point known as the touchpoint. This contact reduces the resistance between...
448

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pseudo-slimy: A novel phenomenon to evoke stickiness perception.

i-Perception·2026
Same author

FingerWrap: A High-Density Finger-Enveloping Tactile Display.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2026
Same author

Eliciting Pleasantness With Haptic Feedback: The Role of Physical and Pseudo-Haptic Resistance in Virtual Archery.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2025
Same author

Visual Features Involved in Determining Apparent Elasticity Elicit Touch Desire.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2025
Same author

Spatiotemporal motion features resulting from tactile interface layouts influence tactile speed perception.

iScience·2024
Same author

Computational account for the naturalness perception of others' jumping motion based on a vertical projectile motion model.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2024
Same journal

Embodied Care and Consent in Mediated Social Touch Interactions: A Study of the Interactive Artwork The Alien Between Us.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2026
Same journal

Investigating the Perception of Shape-Changing Haptic Interfaces.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2026
Same journal

Vibrations Feel Longer than their Visual Analogues in Virtual Reality.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2026
Same journal

Power from Potential: A Survey of Electrostatic Actuators for Haptics.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2026
Same journal

Investigating the Role of Vibrotactile Cue Sequencing in Inducing Intuitive Wrist Motion from a Stationary Pose.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2026
Same journal

Active Lubrication Brakes in Tabletop and Hand-Held Haptic Surgical Drilling Simulators.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Grasping Abilities for Hemiplegic Patients with Flexible Robotic Limbs
03:55

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Grasping Abilities for Hemiplegic Patients with Flexible Robotic Limbs

Published on: October 27, 2023

2.3K

Exploring Acceptable Weight Criteria for Finger-Worn Haptic Device Design.

Yusuke Ujitoko, Tao Morisaki

    IEEE Transactions on Haptics
    |June 16, 2025
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Finger-worn haptic devices up to 60g are acceptable for office tasks. Device weight did not impact performance, though user load increased slightly, suggesting practical design criteria for wearable technology.

    More Related Videos

    Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
    07:15

    Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

    Published on: December 18, 2020

    4.6K
    Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects
    07:32

    Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects

    Published on: September 1, 2016

    12.8K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Sep 19, 2025

    Author Spotlight: Enhancing Grasping Abilities for Hemiplegic Patients with Flexible Robotic Limbs
    03:55

    Author Spotlight: Enhancing Grasping Abilities for Hemiplegic Patients with Flexible Robotic Limbs

    Published on: October 27, 2023

    2.3K
    Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
    07:15

    Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

    Published on: December 18, 2020

    4.6K
    Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects
    07:32

    Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects

    Published on: September 1, 2016

    12.8K

    Area of Science:

    • Human-Computer Interaction
    • Wearable Technology
    • Ergonomics

    Background:

    • Finger-worn haptic devices offer advanced functionality but face design challenges due to weight.
    • Increased device weight can impede wearer dexterity and comfort, hindering adoption.
    • Current research lacks clear weight criteria for continuous wear of such devices.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To establish acceptable weight criteria for finger-worn haptic devices during continuous wear.
    • To investigate the impact of device weight on performance during common office tasks.
    • To determine if device placement affects performance and user perception.

    Main Methods:

    • Participants performed pointing and typing tasks wearing a finger-worn haptic device mockup.
    • Device weight was manipulated (0, 20, 40, 60g) and placement varied (proximal, distal).
    • Task performance (speed, accuracy) and subjective user load were measured.

    Main Results:

    • Device weight up to 60g did not significantly degrade performance in pointing or typing tasks.
    • Device placement (proximal vs. distal) did not affect task performance.
    • Subjective user load ratings increased under certain conditions with heavier devices.

    Conclusions:

    • Finger-worn haptic devices weighing up to 60g are suitable for office environments without compromising task performance.
    • Weight is a less critical factor than previously assumed for short-term office tasks.
    • Future designs can prioritize functionality, considering up to 60g acceptable for index finger devices.