Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Comparison of WHO and CDC growth charts for defining weight status in the young population in Israel: a
Michal Yackobovitch-Gavan1,2, Moshe Phillip3,4, Shlomit Shalitin3,4
1The Jesse Z. and Sara Lea Shafer Institute of Endocrinology and Diabetes, National Center for Childhood Diabetes Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, 14 Kaplan St., 49202-35, Petah Tikva, Israel. michalyg2000@gmail.com.
Insights
Using CDC or WHO growth charts significantly impacts pediatric weight classification in Israel, especially for young children. Policymakers should consider national growth charts to accurately assess childhood growth and prevent misclassification of overweight and obesity.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Endocrinology
- Public Health Nutrition
- Growth Monitoring
Background:
- Israel lacks national pediatric growth charts, relying on CDC or WHO standards.
- This study compares BMI z-scores and weight classifications using CDC vs. WHO charts in Israeli children.
- Utilized Clalit Health Services (CHS) data for a large-scale cross-sectional analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare Body Mass Index (BMI) z-scores and weight classifications between CDC and WHO growth charts in Israeli children.
- To identify discrepancies in pediatric weight status assessment based on the chosen growth standard.
- To inform decisions regarding the adoption of growth monitoring standards in Israel.
Main Methods:
- Analyzed BMI data from 1,475,543 children (aged 2-18) in the CHS database (2017-2023).
- Calculated BMI z-scores using both CDC and WHO growth charts, stratified by sex and age groups (2-5 and >5-18 years).
- Excluded improbable BMI measurements ( <10 or >60 kg/m²).
Main Results:
- Significant differences in median BMI z-scores between CDC and WHO charts, particularly in children aged 2-5 years.
- CDC charts indicated higher overweight rates in younger children (over 4% more) compared to WHO charts.
- Weight classification agreement varied, with moderate to strong agreement in older children but minimal agreement in younger children.
Conclusions:
- The choice of growth standard (CDC vs. WHO) significantly affects pediatric weight classification, risking misdiagnosis of overweight and obesity.
- Developing national growth charts tailored to the Israeli pediatric population is recommended.
- Resource allocation for early interventions addressing both undernutrition and overnutrition is crucial.
Background:
In Israel, the absence of national growth charts leads to the use of CDC or WHO growth charts to assess pediatric growth indices. This population-based cross-sectional study compared BMI z-scores and weight classifications using CDC and WHO charts in children insured by Clalit Health Services (CHS).
Methods:
The study analyzed the CHS electronic database for patients aged 2-18 years with at least one recorded BMI measurement from January 2017 to December 2023. Exclusion criteria included improbable BMI measurements (> 60 kg/m2 or < 10 kg/m2). Demographic data, height, and weight were collected, and BMI z-scores were calculated using both CDC and WHO growth charts. Results were stratified by sex and age groups (2-5 years and > 5-18 years).
Results:
The cohort included 1,475,543 children: 488,008 aged 2-5 years (52% male) and 987,535 aged > 5-18 years (51% male). In the younger group, the median CDC BMI z-scores were below 0 (< 50th percentile), while the median WHO BMI z-scores were above 0 for both sexes, with significant differences between methods (P < 0.001). BMI z-scores were lower in males than in females across both methods (P < 0.001). In the older group, for both methods, the median BMI z-scores were above 0. WHO z-scores had higher medians in males compared to CDC z-scores (P < 0.001), while in females, z-scores were similar between methods (P = 0.210). CDC showed lower median z-scores for males compared to females (P < 0.001), whereas WHO results were comparable between sexes (P = 0.337). There were significant discrepancies in weight classification, particularly in the 2-5 age group. Overweight rates were over 4% higher using CDC charts compared to WHO (P < 0.001), with minimal agreement (Kappa = 0.06 for males, 0.01 for females). In the older group, WHO classified 4% more children as overweight than CDC (P < 0.001), with moderate agreement in males (Kappa = 0.74) and strong agreement in females (Kappa = 0.81).
Conclusions:
The study underscores the risk of misclassifying childhood overweight and obesity depending on the growth standard used, particularly in younger children. Policymakers should carefully choose appropriate standards and consider developing national growth charts tailored to the local pediatric population, while allocate resources for early interventions addressing both undernutrition and overnutrition.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Obesity
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Cross-Sectional Research
z Scores and Area Under the Curve
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

