[18F]FET PET-Guided management of pseudoprogression in glioblastoma (FET POPPING): the study protocol for a

V J Ruijters1, T J Snijders2, J A J van der Pol3

  • 1Department of Neurology (VJR, TJS), Department of Epidemiology and Health Economics, Julius Centre (GWJF, RMTtH), Radiology (JWD), Neurosurgery (PAR), Medical Oncology (FYFLdV) and Nuclear Medicine (MGEHL, NT), UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands. v.j.ruijters-6@umcutrecht.nl.

Trials
|June 17, 2025
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

This study investigates if [18F]Fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine positron emission tomography (FET PET) improves glioblastoma patient management. FET PET may reduce unnecessary interventions and enhance quality of life compared to MRI alone.

Area of Science:

  • Neuro-oncology
  • Diagnostic Imaging
  • Radiotherapy

Background:

  • Distinguishing tumor progression from pseudoprogression in glioblastoma post-chemoradiation is challenging with MRI alone.
  • Advanced MRI techniques offer limited diagnostic certainty, potentially leading to delayed or incorrect treatment decisions.
  • [18F]Fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine positron emission tomography (FET PET) shows promise in differentiating these conditions but is underutilized due to cost and logistical concerns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the added clinical value of [18F]FET PET in managing glioblastoma patients with diagnostic uncertainty after chemoradiation.
  • To determine if incorporating [18F]FET PET into clinical management reduces unnecessary interventions and improves quality of life.
  • To assess the cost-effectiveness of using [18F]FET PET in this patient population.

Main Methods:

  • A multicenter randomized clinical trial involving 144 adult IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients with contrast enhancement on MRI.
  • Patients are randomized 1:1 to receive either standard MRI or MRI plus [18F]FET PET for clinical management decisions.
  • Primary endpoints include the rate of unnecessary interventions and health-related quality of life at 12 weeks; secondary endpoints include survival and cost-effectiveness.

Main Results:

  • Hypothesized reduction in unnecessary interventions in the [18F]FET PET arm.
  • Expected improvement in health-related quality of life at 12 weeks for patients managed with [18F]FET PET.
  • Anticipated reduction in net healthcare costs with the addition of [18F]FET PET.

Conclusions:

  • [18F]FET PET is hypothesized to enhance clinical management of glioblastoma patients.
  • The study aims to demonstrate improved patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness compared to MRI-based management alone.
  • Findings could support wider adoption of [18F]FET PET in neuro-oncology settings.