Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

PET and MRI Guided Irradiation of a Glioblastoma Rat Model Using a Micro-irradiator
Published on: December 28, 2017
[18F]FET PET-Guided management of pseudoprogression in glioblastoma (FET POPPING): the study protocol for a
V J Ruijters1, T J Snijders2, J A J van der Pol3
1Department of Neurology (VJR, TJS), Department of Epidemiology and Health Economics, Julius Centre (GWJF, RMTtH), Radiology (JWD), Neurosurgery (PAR), Medical Oncology (FYFLdV) and Nuclear Medicine (MGEHL, NT), UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands. v.j.ruijters-6@umcutrecht.nl.
Background:
During follow-up of glioblastoma patients after chemoradiation, expert teams often observe abnormalities on MRI with difficulty in distinguishing between tumor growth and pseudoprogression. Although advanced MRI techniques such as perfusion weighted imaging provide additional information, diagnostic uncertainty often remains, leading to incorrect or delayed diagnosis, and inappropriate treatment, such as unnecessary surgery. [18F]Fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine positron emission tomography (FET PET) has good discriminating power for this setting. Still, this diagnostic tool is not used frequently in The Netherlands due to costs, logistics and uncertainty about clinical benefit. In the FET POPPING study, we aim to determine the added value of [18F]FET PET for clinical management of glioblastoma patients.
Methods:
A multicenter diagnostic randomized clinical trial will be performed, from August 2024 until December 2027. Adult patients (n=144) with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype glioblastoma will be included, who, at least ≥3 months after the concomitant phase of standard temozolomide-based chemoradiation, have new or increased contrast enhancement on MRI, causing doubt between tumor growth or pseudoprogression. In this trial, pseudoprogression will be used as an encompassing term that includes radionecrosis and other treatment-related changes after (chemo-)radiotherapy. Included patients will be randomized 1:1 in two arms. The investigational arm receives an additional [18F]FET PET scan, and clinical management is based on the index MRI and [18F]FET PET together. Clinical management of the control arm is based on the index MRI alone. Exact clinical management, as based on the available imaging, is chosen at the discretion of the local multidisciplinary board. The primary study endpoints are (a) the percentage of patients undergoing unnecessary interventions and (b) health-related quality of life after 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints include time-to-diagnosis, overall survival, and cost-effectiveness.
Discussion:
We hypothesize that the clinical management guided by an additional [18F]FET PET scan leads to fewer unnecessary interventions, better health-related quality of life after 12 weeks and among others reduced net healthcare costs, compared with management based on MRI only.
Trial Registration:
The trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on the 24th of June 2024, with registration number NCT06480721.
Insights
This study investigates if [18F]Fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine positron emission tomography (FET PET) improves glioblastoma patient management. FET PET may reduce unnecessary interventions and enhance quality of life compared to MRI alone.
Area of Science:
- Neuro-oncology
- Diagnostic Imaging
- Radiotherapy
Background:
- Distinguishing tumor progression from pseudoprogression in glioblastoma post-chemoradiation is challenging with MRI alone.
- Advanced MRI techniques offer limited diagnostic certainty, potentially leading to delayed or incorrect treatment decisions.
- [18F]Fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine positron emission tomography (FET PET) shows promise in differentiating these conditions but is underutilized due to cost and logistical concerns.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the added clinical value of [18F]FET PET in managing glioblastoma patients with diagnostic uncertainty after chemoradiation.
- To determine if incorporating [18F]FET PET into clinical management reduces unnecessary interventions and improves quality of life.
- To assess the cost-effectiveness of using [18F]FET PET in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter randomized clinical trial involving 144 adult IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients with contrast enhancement on MRI.
- Patients are randomized 1:1 to receive either standard MRI or MRI plus [18F]FET PET for clinical management decisions.
- Primary endpoints include the rate of unnecessary interventions and health-related quality of life at 12 weeks; secondary endpoints include survival and cost-effectiveness.
Main Results:
- Hypothesized reduction in unnecessary interventions in the [18F]FET PET arm.
- Expected improvement in health-related quality of life at 12 weeks for patients managed with [18F]FET PET.
- Anticipated reduction in net healthcare costs with the addition of [18F]FET PET.
Conclusions:
- [18F]FET PET is hypothesized to enhance clinical management of glioblastoma patients.
- The study aims to demonstrate improved patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness compared to MRI-based management alone.
- Findings could support wider adoption of [18F]FET PET in neuro-oncology settings.
More Related Videos
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022
11:02Flexible Organic Electronic Devices for Pulsed Electric Field Therapy of Glioblastoma
Published on: August 9, 2022