Phase-Specific Hemodynamic Criteria and Outcomes in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Receiving Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Yuki Ikeda1, Keita Saku2, Jun Nakata3
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Kitasato University School of Medicine Sagamihara Kanagawa Japan.
Background:
Standardized protocols with optimal hemodynamic targets for percutaneous ventricular assist device (PVAD) management remain undefined. We aimed to evaluate the proportion of phase-specific hemodynamic criteria achieved during PVAD support and their association with outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock.
Methods:
This multicenter retrospective study enrolled patients with cardiogenic shock requiring PVAD (Impella). Patients were evaluated at 24 hours post-PVAD, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation weaning, and PVAD weaning. Hemodynamic criteria consisted of key targets, including mean arterial pressure ≥60 mm Hg, lactate <2.0 mmol/L, right atrial pressure <15 mm Hg, pulmonary artery wedge pressure <20 mm Hg, pulmonary artery pulsatility index ≥1.0, and cardiac power output ≥0.6 W. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day all-cause mortality and unplanned mechanical circulatory support reintroduction.
Results:
A total of 501 patients were enrolled: 206 (41%) with PVAD alone and 295 (59%) with PVAD and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The majority of patients were supported with Impella CP (406, 81%). Fulfillment of criteria was observed in 37%, 52%, and 45% at 24 hours post-PVAD, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation weaning, and PVAD weaning, respectively. Patients with unfulfilled criteria at each evaluation point were at high risk for the primary outcome (hazard ratio, 3.2 [95% CI, 2.1-4.8]; hazard ratio, 2.1 [1.2-3.7]; and hazard ratio, 2.0 [95% CI, 1.1-3.6]). Hemodynamic criteria achievement consistently stratified the risk of the primary outcome across different subgroups, including shock cause, shock stage, and concomitant use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Conclusions:
Phase-specific hemodynamic criteria are often unmet and are associated with significantly higher risks of short-term fatal events.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

