Understanding Unwarranted Variation in Care for Victorian Oesophagogastric Cancer Patients Using Linked Data: A
Frances Graham1, Wanyu Chu2, Helena Rodi1
1VICS Optimal Care Summits Program, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Background:
The Victorian Integrated Cancer Services convened the second Oesophagogastric (OG) Cancer Optimal Care Summit to determine unwarranted variation in care between 2017 and 2021 and compare trends with the first summit (reporting 2012-2016). Statewide administrative datasets were assessed retrospectively at the population level in alignment with the optimal care pathway steps for OG.
Methods:
Victorians with a primary diagnosis of OG cancer were identified via the Victorian Cancer Registry dataset and linked to various administrative datasets to identify unwarranted variations.
Results:
Of the 9868 Victorians diagnosed with OG cancer between 2012 and 2021, 39.4% were metastatic at diagnosis. Improved outcomes between time periods included reduced mortality for OG cancer and post-surgical mortality 1 year post gastrectomy. Patient multidisciplinary meeting presentation increased from 74% to 86%. Unwarranted variations included time from diagnosis to any treatment within 6 weeks for non-metastatic gastric cancer (64%, 2012-2016 and 60%, 2017-2021) and for oesophageal cancer patients (58%, 2012-2016 and 60%, 2017-2021). One regional Integrated Cancer Service (ICS) demonstrated statistically lower survival compared to the statewide average for gastric cancer in 2017-2021. There was greater variation in survival for gastric cancer for 2017-2021 compared to 2012-2016. Rates of dietitian and/or physiotherapist involvement within 3 months of diagnosis for OG cancer surgical and/or chemotherapy patients were low across all ICS and both time periods.
Conclusions:
The Victorian cancer system demonstrates improved survival outcomes for OG cancer patients between the two time periods. Time between diagnosis and treatment, lower survival rates in some ICS, and access to supportive care (e.g., dietetics and physiotherapy) remain areas of deficiency.
More Related Videos
09:40An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Relative Risk
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
