An exploratory assessment of early and delta PET radiomic features for outcome prediction in locally advanced cervical cancer

  • 0Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Oncological Radiotherapy, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Radiomic features from [18F]FDG-PET scans did not predict disease-free survival in locally advanced cervical cancer patients. While early and delta radiomic features showed slightly improved prediction for overall survival, their clinical utility remains limited.

Area Of Science

  • Oncology
  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging

Background

  • Locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) requires effective prognostic markers.
  • Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery is a standard treatment for LACC.
  • Predicting treatment response and patient outcomes is crucial for optimizing LACC management.

Purpose Of The Study

  • To evaluate if radiomic features from baseline and early [18F]FDG-PET scans, and their changes, can predict prognosis in LACC patients.
  • To assess the prognostic value of radiomic features for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

Main Methods

  • Retrospective analysis of 95 LACC patients treated with neoadjuvant CRT and surgery.
  • [18F]FDG-PET/CT scans were acquired before (baseline) and two weeks after (early) neoadjuvant CRT.
  • Radiomic features were extracted from PET images; delta radiomics quantified changes. Models (radiomic, clinical, combined) were built and validated using 5-fold cross-validation.

Main Results

  • None of the models could predict DFS (C-indices ≤ 0.72).
  • Models predicting OS showed slightly better performance.
  • Mean C-indices for OS were 0.75 (early radiomic/combined), 0.79 (delta radiomic), 0.78 (delta combined), and 0.76 (clinical models).

Conclusions

  • Early and delta radiomic features from [18F]FDG-PET scans did not predict DFS in LACC patients.
  • While radiomic models showed marginal improvement for OS prediction over clinical models, their added value for clinical practice is limited.