Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

09:51
Laparoscopic Anterior Right Hepatectomy: A Single-Center Experience
Published on: December 4, 2023
1.2K
Right versus Middle Hepatic Vein access and One-Year TIPS Outcomes.
Vikrant Khare1, Travis Merritt2, Natalia Zbib
1Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. Vikrant.khare19@gmail.com.
CVIR Endovascular
|June 18, 2025
Summary
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement via the middle hepatic vein (MHV) shows similar survival and shunt patency to the right hepatic vein (RHV) access. MHV access significantly reduces hepatic encephalopathy incidence.
Area of Science:
- Interventional Radiology
- Hepatology
- Vascular Access Techniques
Background:
- Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a critical intervention for managing portal hypertension.
- The choice of hepatic vein access (middle vs. right) for TIPS placement is understudied, yet may influence clinical outcomes.
- Understanding the impact of hepatic vein selection is crucial for optimizing TIPS procedures and patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare one-year clinical outcomes of TIPS placement using middle hepatic vein (MHV) versus right hepatic vein (RHV) access.
- To evaluate the influence of hepatic vein access on shunt patency, patient survival, and the incidence of hepatic encephalopathy (HE).
- To assess the impact of access route on portal hypertension-related complications like ascites, hydrothorax, and gastrointestinal bleeding.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective chart review of adult patients undergoing TIPS with Viatorr stent graft between 2014-2022.
- Patients were stratified based on either MHV or RHV access for shunt creation.
- Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) guided direct hepatic to portal vein access; shunts were dilated to achieve target portosystemic gradient (PSG) reduction.
Main Results:
- One-year survival (84% MHV vs. 75% RHV) and patency rates (96% MHV vs. 87% RHV) were comparable between groups.
- MHV access significantly reduced the incidence of de novo hepatic encephalopathy (30% vs. 62%, p=0.008), including moderate-to-severe cases (16% vs. 42%, p=0.017).
- Similar post-TIPS PSG reduction was achieved despite more frequent use of smaller diameter shunts (8mm) with MHV access; no difference in ascites, hydrothorax, or GI bleeding outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Both MHV and RHV access routes yield similar shunt patency, survival, and TIPS indication outcomes.
- MHV access is associated with a significantly lower incidence of hepatic encephalopathy.
- MHV may be the preferred hepatic vein access for TIPS, particularly in patients at higher risk for developing hepatic encephalopathy, while achieving comparable hemodynamic results.

