Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
Published on: January 17, 2013
Machine learning and the labor market: A portrait of occupational and worker inequities in Canada
Arif Jetha1, Qing Liao2, Faraz Vahid Shahidi1
1Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, ON, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
Introduction:
Machine learning (ML), an artificial intelligence (AI) subfield, is increasingly used by Canadian workplaces. Concerningly, the impact of ML may be inequitable and contribute to social and health inequities in the working population. The aim of this study is to estimate the number of workers in occupations with high, medium, and low ML exposure and describe differences in exposure according to occupational and worker sociodemographic factors.
Methods:
Canadian occupations were scored according to the extent to which they were made up of job tasks that could be performed by ML. Eight years of data from Canada's Labour Force Survey were pooled and the number of Canadians in occupations with high, medium, or low exposure to ML were estimated. The relationship between hourly wages, educational attainment, and job skill, training and experience requirements, and ML exposure was examined using multinomial models that were stratified by gender.
Results:
Approximately 5.7 million Canadians are working in occupations characterized by high ML exposure. Women workers and workers with a college or bachelor's degree and in occupations with lower job skills requirements made up a greater proportion of workers in occupations with high ML exposure. Multinomial models indicated gender differences in the relationship between independent variables and ML exposure. Among men, higher educational attainment and hourly wages were associated with high occupational ML exposure. However, among women, higher educational attainment and hourly wages were associated with low occupational ML exposure.
Conclusion:
ML exposure is segmented according to occupational and worker sociodemographic characteristics and has the potential to widen inequities in the working population. ML may have a gendered effect and disproportionately impact certain groups of women when compared to men. We provide a critical evidence base to inform strategic responses that ensure inclusion in a working world where ML is commonplace.
More Related Videos
07:31A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills
Published on: February 13, 2020
10:43Eye-tracking Technology and Data-mining Techniques used for a Behavioral Analysis of Adults engaged in Learning Processes
Published on: June 10, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Compensation Mechanisms
Respiratory Compensation
This mechanism addresses metabolic-induced pH imbalances by adjusting breathing rates. Respiratory compensation begins within minutes of detecting a pH...
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Stereotype Content Model
Halo Effect
Equity Theory
Quantifying Work