Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

04:01
The Modified Single-working Portal Technique Using Lasso-loop Stitch with Needle for Arthroscopic Subscapularis Repair
Published on: August 8, 2025
74
Defining Clinically Meaningful Subgroups in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Using Unsupervised
Yining Lu1, Elyse J Berlinberg2, Kareme Alder1
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
|June 19, 2025
Summary
Unsupervised machine learning identified patient subgroups after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR). Larger tear size and specific tendon involvement predict poorer outcomes, while biceps tenodesis improves results.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Machine Learning in Medicine
- Patient Outcomes Research
Background:
- Clinically significant outcomes (CSOs) are crucial for evaluating arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) success.
- Predicting global CSO achievement after RCR remains a challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify distinct patient subgroups based on CSO achievement after elective arthroscopic RCR using unsupervised machine learning.
- To uncover factors influencing CSO achievement in RCR patients.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of a prospectively collected database of patients undergoing arthroscopic RCR.
- Utilized an unsupervised random forest algorithm to partition patients into subgroups based on CSO achievement.
- Employed stepwise multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of optimal CSO achievement.
Main Results:
- Two distinct subgroups (optimal and suboptimal CSO achievement) were identified among 333 patients.
- Increased rotator cuff tear size (sagittal dimension >1.9 cm), number of tendons involved, and subscapularis involvement predicted suboptimal outcomes.
- Subpectoral biceps tenodesis was associated with a higher likelihood of CSO achievement compared to biceps tenotomy.
Conclusions:
- Unsupervised machine learning effectively identified clinically meaningful subgroups after arthroscopic RCR.
- Tear size, number of tendons involved, and subscapularis involvement are significant predictors of suboptimal CSO achievement.
- Biceps tenodesis demonstrates a protective effect, increasing the likelihood of achieving CSOs compared to tenotomy.
