Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Assessment of Dopaminergic Homeostasis in Mice by Use of High-performance Liquid Chromatography Analysis and Synaptosomal Dopamine Uptake
Published on: September 21, 2017
Estimation of Dopamine D1 Receptor Agonist Binding Kinetics Using Time-Resolved Functional Assays: Relation to
Kristoffer Sahlholm1,2, Peder Svensson3, Marcus Malo3
1Department of Medical and Translational Biology, Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Abstract:
The dopamine D1 receptor (D1R) is prominently expressed in the striatum and cerebral cortex and is an attractive target for treating Parkinson's disease and cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. While newer, noncatechol D1R agonists such as tavapadon have shown promise in recent clinical trials, the therapeutic utility of earlier catechol agonists such as A77636 was hampered by tolerance development. The mechanism underlying tolerance induction was suggested to involve very slow A77636 dissociation from the D1R, promoting prominent arrestin recruitment and receptor internalization associated with delayed recycling to the cell surface. Here, we compared the signaling and binding kinetics of five D1R agonists─dopamine, dihydrexidine, apomorphine, A77636, and tavapadon─using two time-resolved assays of agonist-induced β-arrestin2 recruitment and G protein-coupled inward rectifier potassium (GIRK, also known as Kir3) channel activation, respectively. Additionally, D1R internalization was studied using cell-surface ELISA. Tavapadon and apomorphine did not induce significant D1R internalization, whereas pronounced internalization was observed with A77636, dopamine, and dihydrexidine. GIRK response deactivation time courses upon agonist washout were longer for A77636 and tavapadon compared to dopamine, dihydrexidine, and apomorphine. Similarly, in the β-arrestin2 assay, signal decay upon antagonist addition was slower for A77636 and tavapadon compared to the other three agonists. Tavapadon and apomorphine were partial agonists in both assays, whereas A77636 and dihydrexidine showed efficacies similar to dopamine. While our results do not provide evidence for a direct correlation between agonist dissociation and liability to tolerance induction, the possibility remains that certain combinations of agonist characteristics, such as high efficacy paired with slow dissociation, are associated with tolerance induction by D1R agonists.
Related Concept Videos
Quantitative Aspects of Drug-Receptor Interaction
Drug-Receptor Interactions
Several parameters, such as the drug's affinity for its receptor and its efficacy, which is its ability to activate the receptor, determine the drug's effect on the tissue....
Drug-Receptor Interaction: Agonist
Agonists can bind to receptors in different ways. Some agonists bind directly to the receptor's active site, mimicking the endogenous...
Protein-Drug Binding: Determination Methods
Indirect methods involve isolating the bound drug from its free form in biological samples such as blood, serum, or plasma. These techniques aim to measure the percentage of drugs bound to proteins. Equilibrium dialysis is a commonly used method where the free drug concentration at equilibrium is measured by separating the bound...

