Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
Cost-Effectiveness of an Interdisciplinary, Internet-Based Transgender Health Care Program in Germany: Economic
Thomas Grochtdreis1, Hans-Helmut König1, Janis Renner2
1Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, Hamburg, 20251, Germany, 49 40741053382, 49 40741040261.
The internet-based i²TransHealth program improved mental health for transgender individuals in remote areas but was not cost-effective per quality-adjusted life year. Further analysis is needed for cost-effectiveness based on symptom improvement.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Digital Health
- Transgender Health
Background:
- Specialized care is crucial for transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals with gender incongruence or dysphoria.
- Transgender healthcare structures are often inadequate or inaccessible in remote areas.
- The i²TransHealth program was developed to address these gaps through an interdisciplinary, internet-based approach.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the cost-effectiveness of the i²TransHealth program for TGD individuals in remote areas.
- To evaluate i²TransHealth for those exploring gender identity or in early transition phases.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial compared i²TransHealth to a waiting list.
- The intervention included telehealth, e-health, and general practitioner/psychiatrist care.
- Health outcomes measured quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and reliable improvement on the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 Global Severity Index (BSI-18 GSI).
Main Results:
- No significant difference in QALYs was observed between the intervention and control groups.
- The intervention group showed significantly higher reliable improvement on the BSI-18 GSI (23.02% vs. 9.21%).
- Total costs were significantly higher in the intervention group (+€1390), with an ICER of €254,021 per QALY and €10,786 per BSI-18 GSI improvement.
Conclusions:
- i²TransHealth is unlikely to be cost-effective from a societal perspective when measured by QALYs.
- Cost-effectiveness is unclear when using BSI-18 GSI improvement as the primary outcome, depending on willingness-to-pay.
- Potential distortions in health care service usage data require consideration.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
07:31A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills
Published on: February 13, 2020