Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

07:51
A Novel Approach to Monitoring Graft Neovascularization in the Human Gingiva
Published on: January 12, 2019
6.9K
Expert consensus on peri-implant keratinized mucosa augmentation at second-stage surgery
Shiwen Zhang1, Rui Sheng1, Zhen Fan2
1State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
International Journal of Oral Science
|June 19, 2025
Summary
Sufficient peri-implant keratinized mucosa (PIKM) width is crucial for long-term implant health. This expert consensus provides guidelines for selecting surgical techniques to augment PIKM, aiming for predictable outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Periodontology
- Oral Surgery
Background:
- Adequate peri-implant keratinized mucosa (PIKM) width is essential for maintaining long-term peri-implant health and stability.
- Current surgical techniques for PIKM augmentation are effective but present challenges in selection and application due to varied clinical scenarios and patient anatomy.
- Lack of standardized guidelines complicates decision-making for dental practitioners regarding PIKM augmentation procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish clear guidelines and considerations for peri-implant keratinized mucosa (PIKM) augmentation.
- To focus on commonly employed surgical techniques for PIKM augmentation and factors influencing their selection at second-stage surgery.
- To provide evidence-based guidance for enhancing the predictability and success of PIKM augmentation procedures.
Main Methods:
- Expert consensus development on surgical techniques for PIKM augmentation.
- Analysis of factors influencing the selection of PIKM augmentation methods in various clinical situations.
- Framework development for assessing, planning, and executing PIKM augmentation.
Main Results:
- Identification of key surgical techniques for PIKM augmentation.
- Elucidation of critical factors guiding the choice of PIKM augmentation methods.
- Proposal of a standardized approach to PIKM augmentation procedures.
Conclusions:
- Standardized guidelines are needed to address the heterogeneity in surgical techniques and clinical scenarios for PIKM augmentation.
- This expert consensus offers a framework to improve the predictability and success of peri-implant keratinized mucosa augmentation.
- Evidence-based guidance is crucial for dental practitioners performing PIKM augmentation to ensure optimal long-term peri-implant health.

