Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025
An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
Characterizing advanced stapling technique using objective performance indicators in robotic-assisted sleeve
Sarah Choksi1,2,3, Bishaka Hirachan4,5, Mattia Ballo4,5
1Northwell, 2000 Marcus Ave Suite 300, New Hyde Park, NY, 11042, USA. sarah.choksi@outlook.com.
Background:
Although multiple studies have described the association between the sleeve shape and clinical outcomes, limited objective metrics exist to characterize the creation of the optimal sleeve shape and staple line formation. This study offers a novel, objective method for deconstructing robotic sleeve gastrectomies utilizing advanced stapler-specific metrics with the goal of improving patient outcomes.
Methods:
Robotic sleeve gastrectomies were performed using the da Vinci Xi surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) at our tertiary referral center. This system and the Intuitive data recorder (IDR) were used to collect procedure-specific data. These data included metrics for technique (pitch and yaw during staple fire) and staple line formation [cartridge height (color), staple fire total duration, and pause for compression]. All patients who underwent robotic sleeve gastrectomy in an operating room with an IDR one of the four board-certified, fellowship trained minimally invasive surgeons were included. Postoperative complications including outflow obstructive complications (leaks and PO intolerance) and bleeding were the primary outcomes analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analysis was used to analyze stapler metrics and postoperative outcomes. This is a retrospective cohort study from November 2020 to April 2023.
Results:
Of the 344 patients, 15 had obstructive complications which included postoperative PO intolerance and leaks. Logistic regression demonstrated a ten degree increase in absolute pitch for the first staple fire was associated with an 89% higher risk of obstructive complications (OR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.33-2.70, p < 0.001). While staple height and pause for compression were not associated with bleeding, there may be associations with leaks while examining the last staple fires.
Conclusion:
This is one of the first studies associating objective stapler-specific metrics used to characterize stapling technique with clinical outcomes in robotic sleeve gastrectomy. Further evaluation of postoperative complications using objective metrics will help standardize technique and improve clinical outcomes.
