Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
Published on: March 14, 2018
Genetic and Environmental Effects on Parent-Rated Adaptive Behaviour in Infancy
Hanna Halkola1, Charlotte Viktorsson2, Emily J H Jones3
1Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
None:
Adaptive behaviour refers to the everyday skills that individuals are expected to have to function independently, based on their age and societal norms. Currently, we know little about the role of genetic and environmental factors in parent-rated adaptive behaviours in early infancy. The aim of this study was to investigate the aetiological factors that influence individual variability in different adaptive behaviour domains at 5 months, and the degree of genetic and environmental influences that are unique and shared across these domains. We analysed data from the Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale (VABS-II) motor domain and combined domain of socialization and communication (social-communication) using a multivariate twin modelling approach. Participants were a community sample of monozygotic and dizygotic twins assessed at 5 months of age (n = 594). The results show high shared environmental influence on both motor (0.67) and social-communication (0.78) domains with 45% shared variance. Both had low, but significant heritability estimates (0.21 and 0.12, respectively) but did not share genetic variance. No statistically significant associations were found between polygenic scores for autism, ADHD, schizophrenia, depression, and bipolar disorder, and either of the adaptive behaviours measured here. Our results highlight the importance of shared environmental factors in the development of social-communication and motor skills in infancy, whether it is through social interaction with caregivers, or the stimuli and opportunities presented at home. SUMMARY: During development structural arm length representation is underestimated, while the functional arm length representation is overestimated. Underestimation of structural arm length is driven by an underestimation of hand length, as forearm length is accurate. Structural hand length is underestimated, supporting that underestimation of hand length is a characteristic of human body representation. The opposite pattern of results between structural and functional arm representation suggests the existence of multiple independent representations of the body.
Related Concept Videos
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
Gene-Environment Interactions
Causes of Social Behavior III: Biological and Environmental Influences
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Natural Selection and Adaptation
Beyond physical adaptations,...
Environmental Influences on Intelligence

