Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Novel and Innovative Hybrid Technique for Type A Aortic Dissection
Published on: March 28, 2025
Endovascular Arch and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Intervention in Patients With Connective Tissue Diseases: A Case Series
Griffin P Stinson1, Carlos A Valdes1, Ahmet Bilgili1
1Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Insights
Endovascular repair offers a lifesaving option for connective tissue disease (CTD) patients unsuitable for open repair, demonstrating low aorta-related mortality and a manageable need for secondary interventions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vascular Interventions
- Connective Tissue Diseases
Background:
- Open aortic repair is standard for connective tissue disease (CTD) due to durability concerns with endovascular methods.
- Complex CTD presentations can make open repair high-risk, necessitating alternative approaches.
- Endovascular intervention is explored as a viable option for select CTD patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review institutional experience with endovascular aortic repair in CTD patients.
- To identify specific scenarios where endovascular intervention is a reasonable consideration for CTD patients.
- To evaluate outcomes of endovascular repair in this high-risk population.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 45 CTD patients undergoing endovascular intervention (2006-2023).
- Primary outcome: freedom from aorta-related mortality.
- Secondary outcomes: all-cause mortality and freedom from secondary intervention.
Main Results:
- 88.9% aneurysms and 80.0% dissections were common indications, with 68.9% presenting with both.
- Freedom from aorta-related mortality was 88.7% at 1 year and 83.2% at 3 years.
- 46.7% required secondary intervention, with a median time of 6.5 months.
Conclusions:
- Endovascular intervention is a crucial, often lifesaving, treatment for CTD patients not candidates for open repair.
- Low aorta-related mortality and less than half requiring secondary intervention support its use.
- Endovascular repair serves as a valuable bridge to definitive open repair for CTD patients.
Objective:
Open aortic repair is considered the standard of care for patients with connective tissue disease (CTD) due to the perceived durability advantages compared with endovascular intervention. However, some complex CTD patient presentations increase risk with open repair, favoring endovascular intervention. This analysis sought to review our experience with endovascular intervention in CTD patients and identify scenarios in which this approach may reasonably be considered.
Methods:
Patients with CTD undergoing endovascular intervention at our institution from 2006 to 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was freedom from aorta-related mortality. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and freedom from secondary intervention.
Results:
Forty-five CTD patients underwent endovascular intervention. Thirty-five patients (77.8%) had at least 1 previous aortic intervention. Urgent or emergent presentation was common (n = 31, 68.8%). At index hospitalization, 32 patients (71.1%) underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair, and 6 patients (13.3%) underwent fenestrated and/or branched endovascular repair. Aneurysm (n = 40, 88.9%) and dissection (n = 36, 80.0%) were the most common indications; many patients (n = 31, 68.9%) presented with both. Freedom from aorta-related mortality was 88.7% ± 5% and 83.2% ± 6% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. No clinical or procedural factors were predictive of aorta-related mortality. Twenty-one patients (46.7%) required secondary intervention; the median time to secondary intervention was 6.5 months (6.5, 18.9 months). Freedom from secondary intervention was 60.0% ± 8% and 51.4% ± 9% at 1 and 3 years, respectively.
Conclusions:
Endovascular intervention is often lifesaving in CTD patients who are not initially candidates for open repair. Aorta-related mortality was low, and fewer than half of patients required secondary intervention during the study period. This illustrates the utility of endovascular intervention in bridging CTD patients to definitive open repair.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm I: Introduction
