Povidone-iodine nasal spray (Nasodine®) for the common cold: a randomized, controlled, double-blind, Phase III
Thomas M Polasek1, Peter L Friedland2
1Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Aim:
To determine the safety and efficacy of a 0.5% povidone-iodine nasal spray (Nasodine) as a treatment for the common cold (ACTRN12619000764134).
Methods:
A multi-center, randomized, controlled, double-blind Phase III study was conducted to assess the impact of Nasodine on the common cold. Two hundred and sixty (260) euthyroid adults with qualifying cold symptoms and meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria were randomized 2:1 to Nasodine or matching saline nasal spray (SNS), each applied 4 times daily for 5 days. Cold severity was reported using the WURSS-21 survey. The primary endpoint was impact on nasal symptoms (4-item scale), with the validated 19-item Global Severity Score (GSS) as the key secondary endpoint.
Results:
All cold severity outcomes pointed in favor of Nasodine over SNS. In the ITT (n = 260), the Nasodine benefit over SNS on nasal symptoms was 8.4% (p = 0.217). For GSS, the benefit was 12.6% (p = 0.054) in the ITT population. Post hoc subset analyses showed markedly improved benefits of Nasodine: In subjects with stronger symptoms at enrollment (ES), the GSS benefit was 17.1% (p = 0.023); for those with confirmed viral infection (VES), GSS benefit was 23.0% (p = 0.048); and for those enrolled within 24 h of symptom onset (24S), GSS benefit was 39.7% (p = 0.024). In terms of functional impairment, the Nasodine benefit was greater in all subsets, with 16.1% (p = 0.041) benefit in ITT, 22.2% in ES (p = 0.012), 32.1% in VES (p = 0.023) and 37.1% in 24S (p = 0.093). Nasodine was well tolerated, with mild transient nasopharyngeal discomfort being a common adverse effect.
Conclusion:
Nasodine treatment had a consistently positive and clinically meaningful benefit on overall cold severity when compared with saline nasal spray. Early treatment after symptom onset is an important efficacy factor.
Clinical Trial Registration:
https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=377353&isReview=true, identifier ACTRN12619000764134.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs Used in Upper Respiratory Disorders: Overview
Antihistamines (e.g., Benadryl) block histamines from binding. Histamines are chemicals released during an allergic reaction in the body. As a...
Upper Respiratory Drugs: Decongestants
Most decongestants are readily available over-the-counter in...
Drugs Used in Lower Respiratory Disorders: Overview
Bronchodilators, the first step of respiration enhancement, come in various forms, each with its own mechanism...
Upper Respiratory Drugs: Antitussives, Expectorants, and Mucolytics
Antitussives include codeine, dextromethorphan (Robitussin), and benzonatate (Tessalon). Codeine and dextromethorphan exert their effects centrally by suppressing the cough reflex center in the medulla. Benzonatate operates peripherally within the respiratory tract by...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Acute Pharyngitis
Acute pharyngitis is the inflammation of the back of the throat (pharynx), commonly resulting in a sore throat. It is a frequently encountered condition that prompts individuals to seek medical advice.
Classification
Acute pharyngitis can be categorized based on its underlying cause:


