Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Vegetated Treatment Systems for Removing Contaminants Associated with Surface Water Toxicity in Agriculture and Urban Runoff
Published on: May 15, 2017
Can wetlands designed for flood attenuation efficiently remove nitrogen from agricultural runoff?
Josefin E Nilsson1, Joachim Audet2, Per Magnus Ehde3
1Department of Environmental and Biosciences, School of Business, Innovation and Sustainability, Halmstad University, Box 823, 301 18, Halmstad, Sweden; Department of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University, Box 256, 751 05, Uppsala, Sweden.
Created wetlands can reduce nitrogen pollution and mitigate floods. However, designs prioritizing flood control may reduce nitrogen removal efficiency, especially with intermittent flooding. Further research is needed to balance these ecosystem services.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Ecology
- Agricultural Science
Background:
- Eutrophication from agricultural nitrogen (N) runoff and increased flood risk due to climate change are significant ecological and societal challenges.
- Created wetlands offer dual benefits: nutrient removal and flood attenuation, but their combined efficacy in agricultural landscapes is not well understood.
- Understanding the interplay between water flow buffering and N removal in wetlands is crucial for sustainable land management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how water flow buffering in created wetlands influences nitrogen removal and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
- To compare the N removal and GHG emissions of wetlands with different designs (depth, size) and flooding regimes (intermittent vs. permanent).
Main Methods:
- Experimental wetlands of varying designs and flooding regimes (intermittent vs. permanent) were established.
- Nitrogen removal rates and concentrations of N2O and CH4 were measured under different hydrological conditions.
- Water storage capacity and flow buffering effects were analyzed in relation to N removal and GHG emissions.
Main Results:
- Intermittently flooded wetlands exhibited lower N removal than permanently flooded ones, particularly during non-flow periods.
- Deep, intermittently flooded wetlands showed significantly reduced N removal (25%) compared to deep, permanently flooded wetlands (38%).
- No significant differences in N2O or CH4 concentrations were observed between wetlands with high and low water storage, suggesting similar GHG emissions.
Conclusions:
- Created wetlands designed for flood attenuation may compromise nitrogen removal efficiency.
- Intermittent flooding, while beneficial for flood control, can decrease the effectiveness of wetlands as nutrient sinks.
- Optimizing created wetlands for both flood attenuation and nutrient removal requires careful consideration of design and hydrological management to avoid trade-offs.
Related Concept Videos
Conservation of Mass in Moving, Nondeforming Control Volume
In the context of a detention basin, the conservation of mass states that the total mass of water entering the basin must equal the mass leaving the basin plus any accumulation of...
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Design Example: Design of an Irrigation Channel
Comparative Excretory Systems
Laminar Flow

