Novel risk score for patients undergoing Impella-assisted high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention

Alejandro Lemor1, Tayyab Shah2, Julia B Thompson3

  • 1Department of Cardiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.

Insights

Existing risk scores are inadequate for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HRPCI) with percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (pLVAD). A new HRPCI score demonstrates improved prediction of in-hospital mortality in this complex patient group.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Medical Device Technology

Background:

  • High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HRPCI) with percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (pLVAD) is increasingly prevalent.
  • Existing PCI risk scores were not developed for the unique complexities of pLVAD-assisted HRPCI patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of current PCI risk scores in patients undergoing pLVAD-assisted HRPCI.
  • To develop a novel, specific risk score for predicting outcomes in this patient population.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 1237 patients from the PROTECT III multicenter study undergoing pLVAD-assisted HRPCI.
  • Calculation and assessment of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) bedside and Complex High-Risk Indicated PCI (CHIP-PCI) risk scores.
  • Development of a new risk score for in-hospital mortality using significant pre-procedural variables.

Main Results:

  • Existing NCDR and CHIP-PCI scores showed limited accuracy in predicting in-hospital events (C-indices 0.71 and 0.61, respectively).
  • Five key predictors identified: age >80, eGFR <30, left main disease, acute myocardial infarction, LVEF <30%.
  • The novel HRPCI risk score achieved a C-index of 0.75 and correlated significantly with 30-day mortality.

Conclusions:

  • Current PCI risk stratification tools are insufficient for patients undergoing pLVAD-assisted HRPCI.
  • A new, easily calculable HRPCI risk score shows promise for improving clinical decision-making in this high-risk group.
Abstract