Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Novel and Innovative Hybrid Technique for Type A Aortic Dissection
Published on: March 28, 2025
Development and validation of a novel prognostic score to improve prognostic prediction in patients with type B
Xingfeng Chen1, Linfeng Xie1, Qingsong Wu1
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, P.R. China; Key Laboratory of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Province University, Fuzhou, Fujian, P.R. China; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fujian Provincial Center for Cardiovascular Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, P.R. China.
Objective:
Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is a life-threatening aortic disease with an increasing incidence, which requires accurate risk stratification tools for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). This multicenter retrospective study aimed to enhance the risk prediction of severe adverse events post TEVAR in patients with TBAD by improving the Age, Creatinine, and Ejection Fraction (ACEF) score.
Methods:
This multicenter retrospective study enrolled 547 patients with TBAD who underwent TEVAR between 2015 and 2020. The training cohort (n = 382) from Fujian Medical University Union Hospital was used for model development, whereas the validation cohort (n = 165) from two external centers evaluated performance. Independent risk factors were identified using multivariate logistic regression. The novel composite risk score (ACEF-TBAD) combined age, creatinine, and ejection fraction with hypertension, D-dimer/fibrinogen ratio (DFR), and interleukin-6 (IL-6). Model performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curves, decision curve analysis, and reclassification indices.
Results:
The ACEF-TBAD score demonstrated superior predictive accuracy compared with the original ACEF, modified ACEF, and EuroSCORE II models, with area under the curve values of 0.922 in the training dataset and 0.829 in the validation dataset. Key determinants included hypertension (odds ratio [OR], 4.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.03-11.58; P < .001), DFR (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.16-1.45; P < .001), ACEF score (OR, 4.05; 95% CI, 1.76-9.32; P = .001), and IL-6 (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.11-2.32; P < .001). The score showed excellent calibration (P > .05) and net clinical benefit (decision curve analysis curve). Reclassification analysis revealed significant improvements in risk stratification (net reclassification index, 0.366 in training; 0.206 in validation). The survival curves clearly demonstrated that the ACEF-TBAD score effectively stratified patients into distinct risk categories, which underscores the clinical utility of the ACEF-TBAD score in predicting severe adverse events and supports its use in risk assessment for patients with TBAD.
Conclusions:
The ACEF-TBAD score is a novel and simple risk-stratification tool. This enables early identification of high-risk patients, facilitating personalized treatment and improving patient outcomes.
More Related Videos
04:05Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
09:32Measurement of Pulse Propagation Velocity, Distensibility and Strain in an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Mouse Model
Published on: February 23, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction