Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026
Apparatus for Harvesting Tissue Microcolumns
Published on: October 25, 2018
Microneedling for Facial Rejuvenation: A Systematic Review
Jose A Foppiani1,2,3, James E Fanning1, Kassandra Beltran3
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis St, Suite 5A, Boston, MA, USA.
Background:
Microneedling (MN) has risen in popularity as a non-surgical treatment option for facial skin aging. We aimed to evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) and safety profiles associated with MN.
Methods:
A systematic review was conducted adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Articles were screened for relevance in a two-stage process. Descriptive statistics and a proportion meta-analysis was utilized for patient satisfaction using Stata statistical software.
Results:
Of 346 studies identified, a total of 21 articles reporting outcomes of 723 patients undergoing MN for facial rejuvenation were included for review and meta-analysis. The patient cohort was majority female (72%), and the average age was 48 years. The most common esthetic study endpoints were wrinkling (71%, 15/21), skin texture (33%, 7/21), photoaging (29%, 6/21), and skin laxity (14%, 3/21). The majority of trials (90%, 19/21) treated patients with multiple MN sessions, and these studies' treatment schedules also varied by number and timing of sessions. Pooled meta-analysis revealed that 83% of patients reported satisfaction with their treatment (95% CI [0.76; 0.88]). The most common reported adverse effects were transient erythema (6.8%), scaling (1.7%), burning sensation (1.5%), and pruritus (0.4%).
Conclusion:
Our meta-analysis revealed that MN is associated with high patient satisfaction and low rates of adverse events. High patient satisfaction coupled with a low incidence of adverse events supports MN as a viable non-surgical treatment option for facial rejuvenation. However, the lack of standardized measures for esthetic outcomes warrants continued research to better determine its efficacy in treating signs of facial aging.
Level Of Evidence Iv:
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Insights
Microneedling (MN) offers high patient satisfaction for facial aging concerns. This minimally invasive treatment shows a low incidence of adverse effects, supporting its use as a non-surgical option.
Area of Science:
- Dermatology
- Aesthetic Medicine
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Microneedling (MN) is a popular non-surgical cosmetic procedure for facial skin aging.
- Patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) and safety are key considerations for MN efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate patient satisfaction and safety profiles associated with microneedling for facial rejuvenation.
- To synthesize existing evidence on microneedling outcomes through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review conducted following PRISMA guidelines.
- Screening of 346 identified articles in a two-stage process.
- Descriptive statistics and proportion meta-analysis of patient satisfaction data.
Main Results:
- 21 articles involving 723 patients were included; the cohort was 72% female, average age 48.
- Common endpoints included wrinkling (71%), skin texture (33%), and photoaging (29%).
- 83% of patients reported satisfaction; adverse effects were low, including transient erythema (6.8%) and scaling (1.7%).
Conclusions:
- Microneedling demonstrates high patient satisfaction and a favorable safety profile for facial rejuvenation.
- MN is a viable non-surgical option, but standardized outcome measures are needed for further efficacy assessment.
- Continued research is warranted to optimize microneedling protocols for treating facial aging signs.
