Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 8, 2025
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Physiotherapists prioritise compassionate and patient-centred care while navigating systemic constraints and ethical
Gianluca Bertoni1, Sara Patuzzo Manzati2, Valentina Conti3
1Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Campus of Savona, Italy; Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy; Training Unit, Azienda Sociosanitaria Territoriale di Cremona, Cremona, Italy.
Question:
How do physiotherapists address bioethical issues in cancer rehabilitation? What drives physiotherapists' clinical actions regarding non-disclosure, patient autonomy, risk-benefit balance and treatment withdrawal?
Design:
A mixed-methods study with an explanatory sequential design.
Participants:
681 Italian registered physiotherapists recruited via the National Federation of Physiotherapists' Registers.
Intervention:
An online survey assessed physiotherapists' ethical responses, followed by focus groups with participants whose survey responses aligned with key bioethical principles: beneficence/non-maleficence, self-determination, justice/equity, defensive prudence and compassionate care.
Outcome Measures:
Quantitative data identified bioethical principles adherence patterns, while qualitative analysis explored the reasoning behind these ethical stances.
Results:
Quantitative findings highlighted compassionate care as the most emphasised principle (29%), followed by self-determination (26%) and defensive prudence (23%). Beneficence/non-maleficence (16%) and justice and equity (6%) were less prioritised. Qualitative analysis identified five themes: functional recovery as dignity ('clinical good is the patient good'), patient autonomy ('patient knows better'), equity concerns ('everyone deserves care'), risk aversion ('it's better not to take risks') and the relational nature of care ('relationships can heal'). The mixed-methods integration showed how physiotherapists balance ethical ideals with systemic constraints, highlighting the importance of care equity, not underscored by the sole quantitative data.
Conclusion:
Physiotherapists working in cancer rehabilitation prioritise compassionate and patient-centred care while facing systemic constraints, risks and professional responsibilities. This study offers a framework for future research internationally and on other healthcare professionals.
Related Concept Videos
01:27Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
01:27Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
01:19Restorative Care
01:21Cancer Survival Analysis
01:15Techniques of therapeutic communication I: Active Listening, Sharing Observations, Validation, and Using Touch
Therapeutic communication is not the same as social interaction. Social interaction has no goal or purpose and consists of casual information sharing, whereas therapeutic communication has a plan or purpose for the conversation. Therapeutic...
02:49Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...