Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025
Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping and Biopsy for Endometrial Cancer at Early Stage with Laparoscopy
Published on: August 19, 2021
Analysis of Sentinel Lymph Node Adoption Compared to Systematic Lymphadenectomy in Staging Early Endometrial Cancer
Rodrigo Pinto Fernandes1, Cristina Anton1, Marilia Bertolazzi1
1Setor de Ginecologia Oncológica, Divisão de Ginecologia do Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP) - Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Objective:
The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of changing endometrial carcinoma staging from systematic lymph node dissection to the sentinel lymph node approach.
Methods:
This is an ambispective study including patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC) limited to the uterus (FIGO 2018 IA/IB). From December 2015 to October 2021, a group of patients underwent systematic staging with lymph node dissection (LND). From December 2021 to April 2024, another group of patients underwent surgical staging with the sentinel lymph node-indocyanine green (SLN) algorithm and pathology ultrastaging analisys. The groups were matched (1 LND: 1 SLN) based on age, body mass index (BMI), tumor type, tumor size, and myometrial invasion. The primary endpoints were lymph node involvement, length of surgery, and complications. Complications were classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0.
Results:
Two hundred fifty-seven patients were surgically treated during the study period (156 in the LND cohort, 101 in the SLN cohort). Propensity score matching revealed two equivalent groups containing 84 patients each. The rate of positive lymph nodes was similar between the LND group (3.6%) and the SLN group (8.3%) (OR: 2.46, 95% CI: 0.61-9.84; p = 0.205). The length of surgery was significantly lower in the SLN group (152.2 ± 51.9 min) compared to the LND group (304 ± 77.8 min) (p < 0.001). Intraoperative blood loss greater than 100 mL was significantly lower in the SLN group (9.5%) compared to the LND group (29.8%) (p < 0.001). CTCAE grades requiring intervention (grades 3, 4, and 5) were higher in the LND group (14.3%) compared to the SLN group (4.8%) (p = 0.049).
Conclusion:
The transition from LND to SLN approach was similar compared to systematic lymphadenectomy, allowing the reduction of surgical length, blood loss and severity of complications without compromising surgical complications and lymph node positivity.
More Related Videos
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
09:48An Orthotopic Endometrial Cancer Model with Retroperitoneal Lymphadenopathy Made From In Vivo Propagated and Cultured VX2 Cells
Published on: September 12, 2019