Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs of Major Adverse Thrombotic Events in Patients with and without ESKD
Nicholas S Roetker1, Alejandro Victores2, Chuanyu Kou1
1Chronic Disease Research Group, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Insights
Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on dialysis experience significantly higher healthcare costs and resource use from major adverse thrombotic events (MATEs) compared to those without ESKD. Reducing MATEs in dialysis patients is crucial for managing healthcare utilization and costs.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Cardiology
- Health Economics
Background:
- Major adverse thrombotic events (MATEs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on dialysis.
- Limited data exists on the comparative healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs of MATEs between dialysis and non-dialysis populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare HCRU and costs associated with MATEs in older adults with ESKD receiving dialysis versus those without ESKD.
- To inform strategies for managing MATEs in the dialysis population.
Main Methods:
- An observational cohort study of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥66 years experiencing a first MATE (2015-2018).
- Comparison of individuals with ESKD on dialysis (in-center hemodialysis [ICHD] and home dialysis) against individuals without ESKD.
- MATEs identified via claims-based algorithms; outcomes included HCRU and Medicare payments during index event and 1-year follow-up.
- Age-, sex-, and race-adjusted outcomes estimated using model-based standardization; maintenance dialysis costs excluded.
Main Results:
- Index MATE hospitalizations were 1.2-1.3 times longer and 1.2-1.5 times costlier for ICHD patients versus non-ESKD patients.
- One-year follow-up showed 2-3 times higher rates and costs of subsequent MATE-related hospitalizations in ICHD patients compared to non-ESKD patients.
- HCRU and costs for home dialysis patients were generally similar to or higher than ICHD patients.
Conclusions:
- Dialysis patients experiencing MATEs incur greater HCRU and costs than non-dialysis patients.
- Reducing HCRU and costs associated with MATEs is a critical treatment goal for dialysis patients.
- Findings highlight the substantial economic and resource burden of MATEs in the ESKD population.
No abstract available in PubMed .
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention

