Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Pierre Lombrail1, Michel Naiditch2, Christine Ferron3

  • 1Laboratoire Éducations et Promotion de la Santé, LEPS-EA 3412, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, 93017 Bobigny.

Sante Publique (Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, France)
|June 23, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Oral health skills framework for pregnant women: a professional consensus.

BMC pregnancy and childbirth·2026
Same author

Sante publique (Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France)·2026
Same author

Capitalisation as a boundary object in intervention research, serving knowledge production and mobilisation.

Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique·2025
Same author

Family profiles in relation to early childhood caries: a cross-sectional study in France.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Sante publique (Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France)·2025
Same author

The Influence of Educational Determinants on Children's Health: A Scoping Review of Reviews.

Public health reviews·2024
Same journal

Sante publique (Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France)·2026
Same journal

Sante publique (Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France)·2026
Same journal

Sante publique (Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France)·2026
Same journal

Sante publique (Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France)·2026
Same journal

Sante publique (Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France)·2026
Same journal

Sante publique (Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France)·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

This report critiques the Institute for Global Health (IGH) guidelines on using scientific data for disease prevention and health promotion. It highlights issues with definitions, evidence emphasis, research-practice balance, and a behaviorist approach that overlooks health equity.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Health Promotion
  • Disease Prevention

Context:

  • Critique of the Institute for Global Health (IGH) report on scientific data in health.
  • Analysis of a behaviorist approach to public health.
  • Examination of social paresis in health policy.

Purpose:

  • To critically evaluate the IGH report's framework.
  • To identify limitations in the report's definition of disease prevention and health promotion.
  • To address the imbalance between scientific evidence and practical expertise.

Summary:

  • The IGH report's definition of "disease prevention and health promotion" is deemed problematic.
  • Overemphasis on scientific evidence neglects other crucial factors.
  • A behaviorist perspective masks underlying health equity issues.
Keywords:
disease preventionevidence-basedhealth inequitieshealth promotionsocial determinants of health.

Related Experiment Videos

Impact:

  • Highlights the need for a more holistic approach to public health.
  • Underscores the importance of addressing health equity in policy.
  • Calls for a better balance between research and practical expertise in health initiatives.