Mortality risks of infants with unmeasured birth weight in 33 sub-Saharan African countries: an observational

Abiodun Adanikin1, Tina Lavin2, Taofik Ogunkunle3,4

  • 1Centre for Healthcare and Communities, Coventry University, Coventry, UK ad8665@coventry.ac.uk.

BMJ Global Health
|June 23, 2025
PubMed

Insights

Infants not weighed at birth face significantly higher mortality risks up to age five. This lack of measurement highlights potential vulnerability and underscores the importance of birth weight assessment for newborn survival.

Area of Science:

  • Global Health
  • Neonatal Health
  • Pediatric Mortality

Background:

  • Birth weight measurement is not universal, especially in low- and middle-income countries.
  • This study investigates mortality risks for infants without birth weight data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate neonatal, infant, and child mortality in infants not weighed at birth.
  • To compare these risks against infants weighed at birth and those identified with low birth weight.

Main Methods:

  • Cross-sectional observational study of 308,414 African children (2011-2022).
  • Utilized Demographic Health Surveys from 33 countries.
  • Employed mixed-effects Cox regression, adjusting for socioeconomic and survival determinants.

Main Results:

  • 37.84% of infants lacked birth weight measurement.
  • Unweighed infants had 3.51x higher mortality risk at 28 days, 2.15x by age 1, and 1.89x by age 5 compared to weighed infants.
  • Unweighed infants also showed higher mortality risks than low birth weight infants.

Conclusions:

  • Absence of birth weight measurement is linked to increased mortality risk up to age five.
  • Lack of measurement may signal higher risk profiles and vulnerability in newborns.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.5K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
705
Applications of Life Tables01:22

Applications of Life Tables

Life tables are versatile across various fields, providing a quantitative basis for analyzing mortality and survival rates. Whether used by demographers, actuaries, epidemiologists, or sociologists, life tables offer valuable insights into the dynamics of life and death, facilitating informed decisions in public health, insurance, conservation, and beyond. Their broad applicability highlights the interconnectedness of demographic data with practical outcomes in everyday life and strategic...
126
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
11.4K
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
366