Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Fabrication of Pulsatile Polymeric Microparticles Encapsulating Rabies Antigen
Published on: May 12, 2023
Enhancing Emergency Preparedness: A Call to Incorporate Postexposure Prophylaxis in Mass Casualty Protocols
Majani Edward1, Archie Hellar1, Chizaram Onyeaghala2
1Department of Public Health St. Francis University College of Health and Allied Sciences Ifakara Tanzania.
Introduction:
Mass casualty incidents (MCIs) present significant challenges to emergency response systems, often overwhelming healthcare resources. This article highlights the critical role of integrating postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) into emergency protocols to mitigate immediate and secondary health risks occurring due to mass casualty. The aim is to underscore the importance of PEP in MCI management and advocate for its systematic incorporation into emergency preparedness and response.
Methods:
This is a perspective article drawing upon existing literature, guidelines from organizations such as UNAIDS, and expert opinion to synthesize the importance of PEP in the context of MCIs. It discusses the rationale for PEP, challenges in its implementation, particularly in resource-limited settings, and proposes strategies for its integration into emergency protocols.
Results:
The analysis underscores that prompt PEP administration significantly reduces the risk of bloodborne pathogen transmission following potential exposure during MCIs. Effective MCI response necessitates hospital preparedness, robust Emergency Medical Services (EMS), interagency collaboration, and trained personnel. The potential for HIV transmission in crash emergencies is often overlooked, highlighting the urgent need for PEP inclusion in emergency protocols. Key recommendations include establishing robust surveillance systems, training first responders, ensuring the availability of personal protective equipment and point-of-care test kits, establishing blood bank networks, and ensuring widespread access to PEP with a low threshold for its administration.
Conclusion:
Integrating PEP into emergency response strategies is imperative for enhancing the resilience and preparedness of healthcare systems, especially in resource-constrained settings. This proactive approach can significantly reduce morbidity, mortality, and the public health burden associated with infectious disease transmission following MCIs. Therefore, the systematic incorporation of PEP into emergency protocols, supported by interagency collaboration, training, and resource allocation, is strongly recommended.
Related Concept Videos
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets
Contact Precautions:
Contact precautions are the measures taken to prevent the transmission of infectious agents, especially epidemiologically important microorganisms such as MRSA or influenza, primarily transmitted through direct or indirect contact with an...
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Prevention of Further Absorption of Poison

