Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Hierarchy of Motor Control

Hierarchy of Motor Control

The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.

Muscle Coordination and Action

Muscle Coordination and Action

Muscle coordination is a complex and finely tuned process essential for smooth and purposeful movements like flexion, extension, adduction, abduction, and rotation. The human body orchestrates the actions of various muscles working in concert, each with a specific role. Four functional types describe how muscles work together: agonist, antagonist, synergist, and fixator.
Agonists
Agonist muscles, often called prime movers, are the primary muscles responsible for producing a specific movement....

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Choosing difficulty: Self-determined versus assigned tasks in motor sequence learning.

Human movement science·2026

Same author

A Multilayer Model of Automatization: Core processes driving the emergence of automatic action control.

Acta psychologica·2025

Same author

Creativity in Olympic Bouldering: Exploring the Role of Climbing Level and Route Previewing.

Journal of sport & exercise psychology·2025

Same author

Valid knowledge of performance provided by a motion capturing system in shot put.

Frontiers in sports and active living·2025

Same author

Competitive performance predictors in speed climbing, bouldering, and lead climbing.

Journal of sports sciences·2023

Same author

Task integration in complex, bimanual sequence learning tasks.

Psychological research·2023

Same journal

Body image resources for parents of youth: a scoping review.

Frontiers in psychology·2026

Same journal

Mindfulness- and acceptance-based interventions for music performance anxiety: a three-level meta-analysis of therapeutic effects, mechanisms, and boundary conditions.

Frontiers in psychology·2026

Same journal

Association between achievement motivation and anxiety symptoms among college students.

Frontiers in psychology·2026

Same journal

Age, income, and the discounting of delayed and probabilistic rewards.

Frontiers in psychology·2026

Same journal

Short-form video addiction and psychological resilience: a cognitive-existential serial mediation model among Chinese college students.

Frontiers in psychology·2026

Same journal

From positive psychology to practical empowerment: theoretical construction and pathway innovation in graduate student mental health education.

Frontiers in psychology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 18, 2025

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

Task integration and anticipation in complex, continuous motor tasks.

Patrick Beißel¹, Stefan Künzell¹

¹Institute of Sports Sciences, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

Frontiers in Psychology

|June 24, 2025

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Task integration aids complex motor learning when task relationships are consistent, but hinders it when inconsistent. Minor sequence errors can be overcome, highlighting nuanced effects on continuous motor skill acquisition.

Keywords:

SRT task anticipation complex motor task implicit motor learning sequence learning task integration

More Related Videos

The Impact of Motor Task Conditions on Goal-Directed Arm Reaching Kinematics and Trunk Compensation in Chronic Stroke Survivors

The Impact of Motor Task Conditions on Goal-Directed Arm Reaching Kinematics and Trunk Compensation in Chronic Stroke Survivors

Published on: May 2, 2021

Motor Dual-Tasks for Gait Analysis and Evaluation in Post-Stroke Patients

Motor Dual-Tasks for Gait Analysis and Evaluation in Post-Stroke Patients

Published on: March 11, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 18, 2025

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

The Impact of Motor Task Conditions on Goal-Directed Arm Reaching Kinematics and Trunk Compensation in Chronic Stroke Survivors

The Impact of Motor Task Conditions on Goal-Directed Arm Reaching Kinematics and Trunk Compensation in Chronic Stroke Survivors

Published on: May 2, 2021

Motor Dual-Tasks for Gait Analysis and Evaluation in Post-Stroke Patients

Motor Dual-Tasks for Gait Analysis and Evaluation in Post-Stroke Patients

Published on: March 11, 2021

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Motor Learning
Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

Current motor learning research often uses simple tasks, not reflecting real-world complexity.
Understanding multitasking and sequential learning in continuous tasks is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate task integration's impact on complex, continuous motor sequence learning.
To adapt existing tasks for a virtual reality environment to study continuous movements.

Main Methods:

Participants performed a complex, bimanual motor sequence task in virtual reality.
The task involved varying degrees of covariation between integrated elements.
An adapted Serial Reaction Time (SRT) dual task was used for continuous movements.

Main Results:

Task integration benefited learning when covariations were consistent.
Inconsistent or missing covariations led to detrimental effects on learning.
Minor inconsistencies within sequences could be mitigated by participants.

Conclusions:

Task integration significantly influences complex, continuous motor learning.
The consistency of task covariations is key to beneficial integration effects.
Further research is needed on motor learning beyond simple, distinct tasks.