Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Simultaneously Dealing With Immortal Time Bias and Residual Confounding: A Case Study of a High-Dimensional
Md Belal Hossain1,2, Huah Shin Ng3,4, Feng Zhu5
1School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
This study found that disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) reduced mortality risk by 28% in multiple sclerosis patients. The novel nested case-control with high-dimensional propensity score analysis minimized bias in observational studies.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Biostatistics
- Pharmacovigilance
Background:
- Observational studies of time-dependent treatments are prone to immortal time bias and residual confounding, hindering accurate treatment effect estimation.
- These biases can distort findings regarding the effectiveness of therapies like disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) in chronic conditions such as multiple sclerosis (MS).
Purpose of the Study:
- To implement a novel analytical framework combining a nested case-control (NCC) design with high-dimensional propensity score (hdPS) analysis.
- To simultaneously address immortal time bias and residual confounding in the estimation of treatment effects.
- To evaluate the association between DMDs and all-cause mortality in individuals with MS.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective cohort of 19,360 individuals with MS in British Columbia was analyzed.
- A 1:4 NCC analysis was employed to mitigate immortal time bias.
- High-dimensional propensity score (hdPS) analysis was utilized to control for residual confounding.
- Sensitivity analyses were conducted using various hdPS parameters and matching strategies to ensure robustness.
Main Results:
- The NCC-hdPS analysis included 3,209 cases and 12,293 controls.
- Exposure to DMDs was associated with a significant 28% reduction in mortality risk (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.62-0.84).
- Sensitivity analyses confirmed consistent findings, with hazard ratios ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 across different methodological variations.
Conclusions:
- The combined NCC and hdPS approach provides a robust framework for unbiased estimation of treatment effects in real-world observational studies.
- This methodology effectively addresses both immortal time bias and residual confounding, enhancing the validity of research findings.
- Reproducible R code is provided to encourage the adoption of this advanced analytical technique by researchers.
More Related Videos
10:46A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
Published on: December 9, 2015
05:44Author Spotlight: Creating a Versatile Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis Model Relevant for Both Male and Female Mice
Published on: October 13, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Longitudinal Studies
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...