Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Pooled shRNA Library Screening to Identify Factors that Modulate a Drug Resistance Phenotype
Published on: June 17, 2022
Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine as Postinduction AML Therapy
Mathilde Hunault1, Cécile Pautas2, Sarah Bertoli3
1Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) d'Angers, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie et Immunologie Intégré de Nantes/Angers (CRCI2NA), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médical (INSERM) - Unit U1307, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) - Unit UMR6075, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire Grand Ouest Against Leukemia (GOAL), Université d'Angers, Angers, France.
Background:
We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare intermediate doses (IDAC) with high doses of cytarabine (HDAC) as postinduction therapy in patients 18 to 60 years of age with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The main objectives were to evaluate noninferiority in overall survival (OS) after IDAC and safety.
Methods:
Patients 18 to 60 years of age with newly diagnosed AML, except those with core-binding factor, acute promyelocytic, Philadelphia chromosome-positive, or post-myeloproliferative neoplasm AML, were eligible. After the induction course, we randomly assigned patients to either IDAC (1500 mg/m2/12 hours) or HDAC (3000 mg/m2/12 hours). Patients with intermediate- and adverse-risk AML were eligible for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in first remission. The primary end point was OS in a predefined per-protocol analysis population. The primary analyses were performed in 1132 randomly assigned patients, with a noninferiority outcome adjusted on the European Leukemia Net (ELN) 2022 risk group, the use of induction anthracycline, the response to induction, and HSCT as a function of time following treatment.
Results:
At 5 years, OS was estimated at 59.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55.0 to 63.3) in the IDAC group versus 57.5% (95% CI, 53.3 to 61.5) in the HDAC group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.15; noninferiority test, P=0.0042). A preplanned analysis was unable to detect any interaction between IDAC or HDAC treatment effect and patient subgroups, including those defined by the ELN 2022 risk group or response to induction prior to random assignment. In addition, the severity of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression and the incidence of related adverse events were lower after IDAC.
Conclusions:
Our trial shows noninferior outcomes in patients 18 to 60 years of age with newly diagnosed AML treated with low- versus high-dose cytarabine; this occurred with similar or lower toxicities. (Funded by the Regional Clinical Research Office, Angers and others; EudraCT number, 2014-000699-24; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02416388.).
More Related Videos
06:08Assessment of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell-Associated Toxicities Using an Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patient-Derived Xenograft Mouse Model
Published on: February 10, 2023
07:38Intracellular Phosphoflow Cytometry of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patient-Derived Xenotransplants
Published on: June 6, 2025