Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
Prioritizing challenges in AI adoption for the legal domain: A systematic review and expert-driven AHP analysis
Sihyun Kim1, Sangyoon Yi1, Sung-Pil Park1
1Graduate School of Future Strategy, KAIST, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
This research explores the crucial challenges influencing the adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the legal domain, a field facing escalating challenges due to rapid technological advancements. We have comprehensively identified, extracted, and evaluated 11 pivotal factors across legal, technical, and socio-ethical dimensions through a systematic review based on the PRISMA guideline. These factors are categorized into three principal groups. Utilizing an analytic hierarchy process (AHP), our innovative approach assesses the relative importance of these challenges based on data meticulously gathered from eight domain experts in law and AI. Our findings pinpoint legal aspects as the paramount category, with liability as the foremost concern among the analyzed factors. These insights offer robust and actionable guidelines for integrating AI into legal practices and underscore this study's unique contribution to bridging the gap between legal professionals and technology developers. By highlighting the practical applications of our results, this paper facilitates a deeper understanding and proactive engagement with the essential considerations pivotal for the future adoption and evolution of AI within the legal domain.
Related Concept Videos
Heuristics
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
Ethical Dilemmas II
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Standards of Care II
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...

