Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Instrument Calibration01:12

Instrument Calibration

281
Instrument calibration is essential for ensuring that instruments produce accurate and consistent results. It is vital in manufacturing, healthcare, testing laboratories, and scientific research. Calibration processes are specific to each instrument and help enhance data accuracy. Each instrument has a unique calibration process tailored to its design and function to improve data accuracy.
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
281
Errors in Taping01:18

Errors in Taping

99
Errors in taping arise from multiple factors that can significantly impact measurement accuracy in surveying. Misalignment of the tape, often due to human error, is one primary source. A skilled rear tapeman, using a telescope, can help correct alignment by guiding the head tapeman; however, human limitations still lead to small inaccuracies. These errors may include misplacement of pins or inaccurate tape readings due to common visual confusions, such as mistaking a six for a nine. Such...
99
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

984
Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
984
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

131
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
131
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

2.6K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
2.6K
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying01:19

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

233
Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of...
233

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The impact of algae growth on forensic evidence: Considerations for latent fingermark visualisation strategies.

Forensic science international·2026
Same author

Bloodstain classification methods: What methods do analysts use, why, and how accurate are they?

Forensic science international·2026
Same author

Assessing the effectiveness of hospital cleaning using fluorescence: a proof-of-concept study and comparison with ATP testing.

The Journal of hospital infection·2025
Same author

Calibration and Zeta Functions for the Wacom DTU1141b.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2025
Same author

Bloodstain classification methods: A critical review and a look to the future.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2024
Same author

An evaluation of two adhesive media for the recovery of DNA from latent fingermarks: A preliminary study.

Forensic science international·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
07:57

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

13.5K

Digitally Captured Signature solution errors revealed by calibration and testing: Two examples.

Nikolaos Kalantzis1,2, Sarah Fieldhouse1

  • 1University of Staffordshire, Stoke on Trent, United Kingdom.

Journal of Forensic Sciences
|June 25, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Digitally Captured Signature (DCS) solutions require careful examination due to potential implementation errors. This study highlights issues in both hardware and software components, emphasizing the need for calibration and verification.

Keywords:
Digitally Captured Signaturedigitizerdocument analysisforce calibrationforensic sciencezeta function

More Related Videos

Medical-grade Sterilizable Target for Fluid-immersed Fetoscope Optical Distortion Calibration
07:03

Medical-grade Sterilizable Target for Fluid-immersed Fetoscope Optical Distortion Calibration

Published on: February 23, 2017

7.8K
An Analog Macroscopic Technique for Studying Molecular Hydrodynamic Processes in Dense Gases and Liquids
11:03

An Analog Macroscopic Technique for Studying Molecular Hydrodynamic Processes in Dense Gases and Liquids

Published on: December 4, 2017

8.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
07:57

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

13.5K
Medical-grade Sterilizable Target for Fluid-immersed Fetoscope Optical Distortion Calibration
07:03

Medical-grade Sterilizable Target for Fluid-immersed Fetoscope Optical Distortion Calibration

Published on: February 23, 2017

7.8K
An Analog Macroscopic Technique for Studying Molecular Hydrodynamic Processes in Dense Gases and Liquids
11:03

An Analog Macroscopic Technique for Studying Molecular Hydrodynamic Processes in Dense Gases and Liquids

Published on: December 4, 2017

8.6K

Area of Science:

  • Biometrics
  • Computer Science

Background:

  • Digitally Captured Signature (DCS) solutions integrate hardware and software for biometric data collection.
  • Technical specifications are often provided, but implementation errors can occur, necessitating independent examination.
  • The non-intuitive relationship between physical force and arbitrary pressure levels in Force Channel data complicates DCS validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate potential implementation errors in Digitally Captured Signature (DCS) solutions.
  • To highlight the importance of examining both hardware and software components of DCS systems.
  • To underscore the necessity of calibrating Force Channel data in DCS solutions.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of two real-world Digitally Captured Signature (DCS) deployments.
  • Examination of both hardware and software components for implementation errors.
  • Communication of identified issues to DCS solution providers for correction.

Main Results:

  • Identified a significant problem within the software component of a DCS solution.
  • Discovered an issue related to the hardware component of another DCS solution.
  • Confirmed that identified problems were addressed and corrected by the respective providers.

Conclusions:

  • Thorough examination and calibration of Digitally Captured Signature (DCS) solutions are crucial.
  • Implementation errors in both hardware and software can impact DCS system reliability.
  • Provider responsiveness to identified issues is key to ensuring the integrity of DCS technology.