Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.7K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.7K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.4K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.4K
Types of Impact01:30

Types of Impact

662
Impacts can be classified in various forms, primarily under two subgroups: central impact and oblique impact. A central impact occurs when two objects collide head-on, possessing opposite velocities aligned along the line of impact. Conversely, an oblique impact occurs when two objects collide at an angle, resulting in a modification of both direction and velocity.
The coefficient of restitution is a metric for understanding the dynamics of impacts. It quantifies the ratio of relative velocity...
662
Community Based Intervention01:30

Community Based Intervention

97
Community-based interventions in mental health represent a paradigm shift from institution-centered care to treatments embedded within the fabric of local communities. By prioritizing inclusion and leveraging existing societal structures, this approach fosters a supportive environment conducive to addressing mental health challenges while promoting individual dignity and agency.
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
97
Impact: Problem Solving01:26

Impact: Problem Solving

262
In an experiment conducted during a Mars mission, a rover propels a projectile with an initial velocity, and the projectile rebounds after colliding with the Martian surface. To ascertain the maximum height attained by the projectile after this collision, the known restitution coefficient and acceleration due to gravity are employed.
By designating the launch point as the origin and utilizing kinematic equations, the vertical component of the projectile's velocity at the point of impact is...
262
Longitudinal Research02:20

Longitudinal Research

12.5K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
12.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Areas of research interest: joining the dots between government and research at last?

F1000Research·2026
Same author

Supporting policy through research funding: how UK funders can use Areas of Research Interest to bridge evidence gaps.

Evidence & policy : a journal of research, debate and practice·2026
Same author

Exploring Stakeholder Involvement in Intervention Implementation Studies: Systematic Evidence Synthesis With an Evidence Gap Map Approach.

Evaluation & the health professions·2025
Same author

Relationship between research activity and the performance of English general practices: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2024
Same author

A modified action framework to develop and evaluate academic-policy engagement interventions.

Implementation science : IS·2024
Same author

'It depends': what 86 systematic reviews tell us about what strategies to use to support the use of research in clinical practice.

Implementation science : IS·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 18, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.4K

The Capabilities in Academic Policy Engagement (CAPE) programme in England: a mixed methods evaluation.

Petra Mäkelä1, Annette Boaz2, Kathryn Oliver3

  • 1Northumbria University, UK.

Evidence & Policy : a Journal of Research, Debate and Practice
|June 25, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Capabilities in Academic Policy Engagement (CAPE) programme increased academic-policy engagement activities but did not impact policy processes. Interventions benefited experienced participants, highlighting the need for inclusive strategies.

Keywords:
academic-policy engagementaction frameworkmixed methods evaluationrelational interventions

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K
Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

3.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 18, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.4K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K
Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

3.8K

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Policy Studies
  • Higher Education Research

Background:

  • Limited evidence exists on effective academic-policy engagement interventions.
  • The Capabilities in Academic Policy Engagement (CAPE) programme aimed to address this gap.
  • Understanding what works, how, and for whom is crucial for optimizing engagement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the activities, outcomes, and impacts of the CAPE programme.
  • To identify enabling conditions for academic-policy engagement.
  • To utilize a modified framework for assessing academic-policy engagement.

Main Methods:

  • Mixed-methods evaluation of four intervention types: seed funding, policy fellowships, training, and knowledge exchange events (2021-2024).
  • Data collection included interviews (n=129), activity observations (n=32), and surveys (n=42).
  • Data analysis employed inductive and framework approaches.

Main Results:

  • CAPE interventions fostered capacity-building, connectivity, conceptual change, and tacit knowledge, primarily through linear (training) and relational (fellowships, seed funding, knowledge exchange) approaches.
  • Interventions were resource-intensive and required skilled intermediaries, with fellowships being particularly demanding.
  • While engagement activities increased, no direct impact on policy processes or outcomes was observed.
  • Experienced participants disproportionately benefited, potentially widening inequalities.

Conclusions:

  • The CAPE programme successfully increased academic-policy engagement activities but did not demonstrate policy impact.
  • Interventions yielded both costs and benefits, often favoring those with prior engagement experience.
  • Future interventions must consider individual/organizational factors, strategic planning, and diversity/inclusion to maximize value and equity.