Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Fractures: Bone Repair01:27

Fractures: Bone Repair

3.7K
Treatment for a fracture is based on the type of break, the bone affected, and the patient's age.
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...
3.7K
Bone Disorders01:29

Bone Disorders

4.0K
Aging and its effect on bone remodeling is the most common cause of bone disorders. In young and healthy people, bone deposition and resorption happen at an equal rate to maintain optimal bone health.
Bone deposition is also affected by the levels of sex hormones like estrogen and testosterone that promote osteoblast activity and bone matrix synthesis. When the level of these hormones decreases due to aging, it causes a reduction in bone deposition. As a result, bone resorption by osteoclasts...
4.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rotating hinge expandable prostheses may have a higher risk of medial tibial plateau deformity compared to constrained hinged expandable prostheses following reconstruction of distal femur in children with primary bone tumors.

European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie·2026
Same author

Depth of the Dorsalis Pedis Artery Distal to the First and Second Tarsometatarsal Joints: A Cadaveric Anatomical Study.

Foot & ankle orthopaedics·2026
Same author

Complications, reoperations, and revisions after surgical treatment of humeral metastases with modular prosthesis, intramedullary nailing or plate fixation: a retrospective analysis.

European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie·2026
Same author

Pain-Related Impairment and Talar Tilt as Predictors of Surgical Decision Making in Advanced Varus Ankle Osteoarthritis.

Foot & ankle orthopaedics·2026
Same author

Diagnostic Accuracy of Synovial Calprotectin in Megaprosthetic Reconstructions: A Prospective Cohort Study from a Tertiary Sarcoma Center.

Cancers·2026
Same author

Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Diagnosing Knee Lesions: Where Are We Now?

Cureus·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Models of Bone Metastasis
08:49

Models of Bone Metastasis

Published on: September 4, 2012

42.4K

Predicting the Risk for Pathological Fracture in Bone Metastases.

Pavlos Altsitzioglou1, Shinji Tsukamoto2, Costantino Errani3

  • 1First Department of Orthopaedics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, 15562 Athens, Greece.

Current Oncology (Toronto, Ont.)
|June 25, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Predicting fractures from advanced cancer bone metastases is crucial but current methods are subjective. This paper reviews objective fracture risk evaluation techniques for skeletal metastases to improve patient management.

Keywords:
CTRAMirels’ scoring systembone metastasespathological fractures

More Related Videos

Semiautomated Longitudinal Microcomputed Tomography-based Quantitative Structural Analysis of a Nude Rat Osteoporosis-related Vertebral Fracture Model
07:12

Semiautomated Longitudinal Microcomputed Tomography-based Quantitative Structural Analysis of a Nude Rat Osteoporosis-related Vertebral Fracture Model

Published on: September 28, 2017

8.3K
Assessment of Bone Fracture Healing Using Micro-Computed Tomography
12:04

Assessment of Bone Fracture Healing Using Micro-Computed Tomography

Published on: December 9, 2022

2.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Models of Bone Metastasis
08:49

Models of Bone Metastasis

Published on: September 4, 2012

42.4K
Semiautomated Longitudinal Microcomputed Tomography-based Quantitative Structural Analysis of a Nude Rat Osteoporosis-related Vertebral Fracture Model
07:12

Semiautomated Longitudinal Microcomputed Tomography-based Quantitative Structural Analysis of a Nude Rat Osteoporosis-related Vertebral Fracture Model

Published on: September 28, 2017

8.3K
Assessment of Bone Fracture Healing Using Micro-Computed Tomography
12:04

Assessment of Bone Fracture Healing Using Micro-Computed Tomography

Published on: December 9, 2022

2.0K

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Orthopedics
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Bone metastases affect 50-70% of advanced cancer patients, increasing fracture risk.
  • Pathological fractures in bone metastases reduce mobility and often necessitate surgery.
  • Accurate fracture risk prediction is vital for managing patients with skeletal metastases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the lack of comprehensive models for grouping patients by fracture risk due to skeletal metastases.
  • To present current objective methods for evaluating pathological fracture risk in bone metastases.
  • To discuss the advantages and disadvantages of existing objective evaluation methods.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current subjective fracture risk assessment methods.
  • Presentation and analysis of objective evaluation techniques for pathological fracture risk in bone metastases.
  • Discussion of the pros and cons of each objective method.

Main Results:

  • Current fracture risk prediction methods are subjective and have low predictive value.
  • The absence of effective comprehensive models hinders personalized treatment planning for skeletal metastases.
  • Objective evaluation methods for pathological fracture risk exist but require further analysis of their utility.

Conclusions:

  • There is a critical need for improved, objective fracture risk assessment in patients with bone metastases.
  • Developing comprehensive models for fracture risk stratification is essential for personalized cancer care.
  • Further research into the efficacy and limitations of objective fracture risk evaluation methods is warranted.