Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
Published on: June 21, 2010
Semantic Evaluation of Nursing Assessment Scales Translations by ChatGPT 4.0: A Lexicometric Analysis
Mauro Parozzi1, Mattia Bozzetti2, Alessio Lo Cascio3
1Medicine and Surgery Department, University of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: The use of standardized assessment tools within the nursing care process is a globally established practice, widely recognized as a foundation for evidence-based evaluation. Accurate translation is essential to ensure their correct and consistent clinical use. While effective, traditional procedures are time-consuming and resource-intensive, leading to increasing interest in whether artificial intelligence can assist or streamline this process for nursing researchers. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the translation's quality of nursing assessment scales performed by ChatGPT 4.0. Methods: A total of 31 nursing rating scales with 772 items were translated from English to Italian using two different prompts, and then underwent a deep lexicometric analysis. To assess the semantic accuracy of the translations the Sentence-BERT, Jaccard similarity, TF-IDF cosine similarity, and Overlap ratio were used. Sensitivity, specificity, AUC, and AUROC were calculated to assess the quality of the translation classification. Paired-sample t-tests were conducted to compare the similarity scores. Results: The Maastricht prompt produced translations that are marginally but consistently more semantically and lexically faithful to the original. While all differences were found to be statistically significant, the corresponding effect sizes indicate that the advantage of the Maastricht prompt is slight but consistent across all measures. The sensitivity of the prompts was 0.929 (92.9%) for York and 0.932 (93.2%) for Maastricht. Specificity and precision remained for both at 1.000. Conclusions: Findings highlight the potential of prompt engineering as a low-cost, effective method to enhance translation outcomes. Nonetheless, as translation represents only a preliminary step in the full validation process, further studies should investigate the integration of AI-assisted translation within the broader framework of instrument adaptation and validation.
More Related Videos
09:00Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
Published on: August 16, 2024
11:05SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients
Published on: February 6, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Evaluation
Nursing Assessment
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments...
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I
There are thirteen domains...
Ordinal Level of Measurement
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks...
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...