Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Relative observer accuracy for dichotomized variables.

L M Irwig, H T Groeneveld, J P Pretorius

    Journal of Chronic Diseases
    |January 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Patterns of metric variability in the dentition of Papio ursinus.

    American journal of primatology·2020
    Same author

    FLUCTUATING ODONTOMETRIC ASYMMETRY, MORPHOLOGICAL VARIABILITY, AND GENETIC MONOMORPHISM IN THE CHEETAH ACINONYX JUBATUS.

    Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017
    Same author

    A new perspective on fluctuating odontometric asymmetry in South African Negroes.

    American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council·2017
    Same author

    Target practice: choosing target conditions for test accuracy studies that are relevant to clinical practice.

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2011
    Same author

    Excess lung function decline in gold miners following pulmonary tuberculosis.

    Thorax·2010
    Same author

    Workplace spirometry monitoring for respiratory disease prevention: a methods review.

    The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease·2010
    Same journal

    LEPROMATOUS LEPROSY AND AUSTRALIA ANTIGEN WITH COMMENTS ON THE GENETICS OF LEPROSY.

    Journal of chronic diseases·2015
    Same journal

    HYPERLIPIDEMIA IN AN ADULT DIABETIC POPULATION.

    Journal of chronic diseases·2015
    Same journal

    ESSENTIAL TRACE METALS IN MAN: MOLYBDENUM.

    Journal of chronic diseases·2015
    Same journal

    DISTINGUISHING PHYSIOLOGIC VARIATION FROM ANALYTIC VARIATION.

    Journal of chronic diseases·2015
    Same journal

    THE PRE-THERAPEUTIC CLASSIFICATION OF CO-MORBIDITY IN CHRONIC DISEASE.

    Journal of chronic diseases·2015
    Same journal

    AORTITIS SYNDROME WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO ITS CLINICAL PICTURE AND ETIOLOGY.

    Journal of chronic diseases·2015
    See all related articles

    Assessing observer accuracy for disease manifestations requires comparing observations to a known cause. A new method using biserial correlation improves accuracy assessment when observations are dichotomized.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical diagnostics
    • Observer variability in disease assessment
    • Statistical methods in epidemiology

    Background:

    • Evaluating the accuracy of multiple observers in disease manifestation is crucial.
    • Current methods may yield incorrect conclusions when observer data is dichotomized.
    • Differences in observer thresholds can complicate accuracy assessments.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose and evaluate a novel method for comparing the relative accuracy of multiple observers.
    • To address challenges in observer accuracy assessment with dichotomized disease variables.
    • To improve the reliability of observer performance evaluation in medical settings.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilizing the biserial correlation coefficient to assess the association between observer findings and a causal variable.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparing observer accuracy based on the strength of association with a known disease cause.
  • Developing a statistical approach suitable for dichotomized observational data.
  • Main Results:

    • The proposed method, based on biserial correlation, offers a more accurate way to compare observer performance.
    • This approach accounts for differing thresholds used by observers when classifying observations.
    • It provides a more reliable assessment of relative observer accuracy than traditional binary methods.

    Conclusions:

    • The biserial correlation-based method enhances the evaluation of observer accuracy for dichotomized disease variables.
    • This statistical technique is valuable for research involving multiple observers and varying classification thresholds.
    • Accurate observer assessment is vital for reliable disease diagnosis and epidemiological studies.