Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Polymers: Molecular Weight Distribution01:10

Polymers: Molecular Weight Distribution

3.8K
For any given polymer, the weight average molecular weight (Mw) is higher than, if not equal to, the number average molecular weight (Mn). The only situation in which the weight average molecular weight and the number average molecular weight are equal is when a polymer consists only of chains with equal molecular weight. However, this never happens in a synthetic polymer, since it is difficult to control the polymerization process up to a molecular level with accuracy to a hundred percent.
3.8K
Molecular Weight of Step-Growth Polymers01:08

Molecular Weight of Step-Growth Polymers

2.3K
Step growth polymerization involves bi or multifunctional monomers. Bifunctional monomers react to form linear step growth polymers, whereas multifunctional monomers react to form non-linear or branched polymers.
As the step-growth polymerization involves step-wise condensation of monomers, the molecular weight also builds up eventually. Consequently, high molecular weight polymers are obtained at the late stages of the polymerization, where 99% of monomers have been consumed.
The extent of the...
2.3K
Polymers: Defining Molecular Weight01:01

Polymers: Defining Molecular Weight

3.1K
Unlike small molecules with definite molecular weights, polymers are a mixture of individual polymer chains of varying lengths, each with a unique molecular weight.  So, the molecular weight of a polymer is expressed as an average value based on the average size of the polymer chains. The two most common forms of averages used for polymers are the number average molecular weight and weight average molecular weight.
The number average molecular weight (Mn) is the summation of the number...
3.1K
Polymer Classification: Stereospecificity01:26

Polymer Classification: Stereospecificity

2.7K
Polymerization generates chiral centers along the entire backbone of a polymer chain. Accordingly, the stereochemistry of the substituent group has a significant effect on polymer properties. Polymers formed from monosubstituted alkene monomers feature chiral carbons at every alternate position in the polymer backbone. Relative to the predominant orientation of substituents at the adjacent chiral carbons, the polymer can exist in three different configurations: isotactic, syndiotactic, and...
2.7K
Polymer Classification: Crystallinity01:21

Polymer Classification: Crystallinity

3.1K
Unlike ionic or small covalent molecules, polymers do not form crystalline solids due to the diffusion limitations of their long-chain structures. However, polymers contain microscopic crystalline domains separated by amorphous domains.
Crystalline domains are the regions where polymer chains are aligned in an orderly manner and held together in proximity by intermolecular forces. For example, chains in the crystalline domains of polyethylene and nylon are bound together by van der Waals...
3.1K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

897
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
897

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Nonlocal Effect of Percolated Particle Networks on Viscoelasticity of Polymer-Filler Nanocomposites: A Mesoscale Simulation Study.

Macromolecules·2026
Same author

LadderGen: a large-scale generative library of ladder polymers for membrane separations.

Materials horizons·2026
Same author

Molecular Mechanisms of Strength and Toughness in Slide-Ring Polymer Networks: Insights from Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Macromolecules·2026
Same author

Understanding and modelling ammonia partitioning and transport across reverse osmosis membrane.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Understanding Viscoelasticity of an Entangled Silicone Copolymer via Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Macromolecules·2026
Same author

Biomass-Based Nanoengineered Cooling Geotextile for Permafrost Thawing Prevention.

ACS nano·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Characterization of Synthetic Polymers via Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time of Flight MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry
06:56

Characterization of Synthetic Polymers via Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time of Flight MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 10, 2018

25.6K

Assessing Uncertainty in Machine Learning for Polymer Property Prediction: A Benchmark Study.

Hao Tang1, Tianle Yue1, Ying Li1

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
|June 25, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Selecting the right uncertainty quantification (UQ) method is key for reliable machine learning (ML) in polymer science. This study benchmarks nine UQ methods, revealing context-dependent performance for predicting polymer properties and accelerating materials discovery.

More Related Videos

Disentangling High Strength Copolymer Aramid Fibers to Enable the Determination of Their Mechanical Properties
06:02

Disentangling High Strength Copolymer Aramid Fibers to Enable the Determination of Their Mechanical Properties

Published on: September 1, 2018

7.2K
The Effect of Construction and Demolition Waste Plastic Fractions on Wood-Polymer Composite Properties
09:06

The Effect of Construction and Demolition Waste Plastic Fractions on Wood-Polymer Composite Properties

Published on: June 7, 2020

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Characterization of Synthetic Polymers via Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time of Flight MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry
06:56

Characterization of Synthetic Polymers via Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time of Flight MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 10, 2018

25.6K
Disentangling High Strength Copolymer Aramid Fibers to Enable the Determination of Their Mechanical Properties
06:02

Disentangling High Strength Copolymer Aramid Fibers to Enable the Determination of Their Mechanical Properties

Published on: September 1, 2018

7.2K
The Effect of Construction and Demolition Waste Plastic Fractions on Wood-Polymer Composite Properties
09:06

The Effect of Construction and Demolition Waste Plastic Fractions on Wood-Polymer Composite Properties

Published on: June 7, 2020

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Computational Chemistry
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Machine learning (ML) accelerates materials discovery but requires reliable predictions.
  • Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is vital for trustworthy ML in high-stakes applications like functional polymer design.
  • Evaluating UQ methods is crucial for optimizing ML model performance and reducing experimental costs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comprehensively evaluate nine UQ methods for ML in polymer property prediction.
  • To assess UQ method performance across diverse datasets, including out-of-distribution (OOD) and specific polymer types.
  • To provide guidance on selecting optimal UQ strategies for accelerating functional polymer discovery.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluated nine UQ methods: Ensemble, GPR, MCD, MVE, BNN-VI, BNN-MCMC, EDL, QR, and NGBoost.
  • Predicted key polymer properties: glass transition temperature (Tg), band gap (Eg), melting temperature (Tm), and decomposition temperature (Td).
  • Assessed models using R², Spearman's rank correlation, and calibration area across various data scenarios.

Main Results:

  • Optimal UQ method selection is context-dependent.
  • Ensemble method excelled in general in-distribution predictions.
  • BNN-MCMC showed strong performance for OOD scenarios; NGBoost was top for high-Tg polymers.
  • BNN-VI demonstrated consistent superiority across nine polymer classes.

Conclusions:

  • Tailored UQ strategies are critical for enhancing ML prediction trustworthiness in polymer science.
  • Effective UQ selection optimizes experimental validation and accelerates the discovery of advanced functional polymers.
  • This benchmark provides a robust framework for UQ method selection in materials informatics.